Historical HW's in the modern era for Brockton to dispute

[Max Power]

Larry Holmes - One of my favourites, would still be a huge factor. Must be pointed out though that his younger streak featured still some weak opponents and the more decent ones like Witherspoon he had severe problems with. He lost to Spinks, that's bad. His best win was as an oldie against Mercer! And Muhammad was shot.

George Foreman - Older version would do better than younger one! Would still be a huge factor because of chin and power and strength.

Muhammad Ali - Would be a factor but only a B-level boxer at HW. Could have got in shape and been a CW champion and served as a sparring partner for genuine HW's

Ken Norton - Would suffer many KO's. Good enough skill but no power and no chin.

Joe Frazier - Would be annihilated, would not even be able to compete

Sonny Liston - Just an oaf. Would not be seriously competitive with the top 20

Floyd Patterson - Would never make it out of the amatuers

Rocky Marciano - Not a HW

Joe Walcott - Would get pulverised

Ezzaard Charles - Not a HW

Joe Louis - Might be able to be a factor at CW but annihilated at HW.

Primo Carnera - would be clowned

Jack Dempsey - Annihilated

and so on...

This is not against Klitschko, this is career performance against a standard run of opponents in the modern era please note!

[ross]

When an old Light heavyweight can beat you up you are going to lose to most if not all those names you mentioned.

So if Arreola is good enough to contend a title, so are all the names you mentioned.

Id also take msot of those names over Stiverne and Arreola.

You are under some illusion that size is everything. Most of those names stood out one way or another skill wise. Todays do not, bar size.

Also, what are the standard for heavies these days? Wlads last bunch of opponents, his most dangerous was knocked out by an old cruiser! Then he defended his title against Mormeck! Pianetta? Wach? Pfffff!

If size was everything Alvarez wouldn't have been made to look like he was standing still against Mayweather.

Spinks wouldn't have beaten Holmes.

[erics44]

the klitchkos have completely flatterned the HW division over the last several years with their boring styles and cheating money driven tactics

that makes this HW era the most insignificant of all time

[Max Power]

Please point to the guys on the list I have been harsh on with "skills" in deep advance of a modern boxer?

It's difficult because many of them weren't actually renowned for them were they!! But I'll take the liberty of selecting Walcott. He has been termed, the "defensive" one of the bunch.

Let me tell you, he was good but Chris Byrd, he wasn't, and Byrd would have been BIG compared to him as well!

Now I'm not arguing with size altogether, that is 1/3 of my angle. I am saying that the total package that all those fighters represented combining size, athleticism and skill was less that what is required by the modern division.

How could it be otherwise?

What about say, Sultan Ibragimov? Could you really see Sultan being seriously challenged by Sonny Liston? I seen that guy weave into a fucking giant wall of muscle and chop him down like he was nothing! Yet slo-mo Liston is somehow magically gonna catch him with one of his mail order shots!

Chris Arreola! HA! Imagine a guy the size of George Foreman but 20lbs heftier and with good stamina, faster, punching in combination and with real skills and an even better chin, THAT'S Arreola! And how do you suppose Mr. Muhammad would "rope a dope" this man??

I tell you how, he'd jump through the ropes and fuckin run for the friggin hills mate and forget all about ever taking up boxing as a profession.

And please I hate to bring it up, but when Arreola was beaten by Adamek, Adamek WAS a HW. He was in fact the same size as the HEAVY 70's version of Ali (the guy I give credit to a bit). Adamek was also a 7 time world champion boxer! before moving up to HW and he did not do it in Ali style by flipping around the place avoiding a fight, he did it by effective counter-punching.

[ross]

Please point to the guys on the list I have been harsh on with "skills" in deep advance of a modern boxer?

It's difficult because many of them weren't actually renowned for them were they!! But I'll take the liberty of selecting Walcott. He has been termed, the "defensive" one of the bunch.

Let me tell you, he was good but Chris Byrd, he wasn't, and Byrd would have been BIG compared to him as well!

Now I'm not arguing with size altogether, that is 1/3 of my angle. I am saying that the total package that all those fighters represented combining size, athleticism and skill was less that what is required by the modern division.

How could it be otherwise?

What about say, Sultan Ibragimov? Could you really see Sultan being seriously challenged by Sonny Liston? I seen that guy weave into a fucking giant wall of muscle and chop him down like he was nothing! Yet slo-mo Liston is somehow magically gonna catch him with one of his mail order shots!

Chris Arreola! HA! Imagine a guy the size of George Foreman but 20lbs heftier and with good stamina, faster, punching in combination and with real skills and an even better chin, THAT'S Arreola! And how do you suppose Mr. Muhammad would "rope a dope" this man??

I tell you how, he'd jump through the ropes and fuckin run for the friggin hills mate and forget all about ever taking up boxing as a profession.

And please I hate to bring it up, but when Arreola was beaten by Adamek, Adamek WAS a HW. He was in fact the same size as the HEAVY 70's version of Ali (the guy I give credit to a bit). Adamek was also a 7 time world champion boxer! before moving up to HW and he did not do it in Ali style by flipping around the place avoiding a fight, he did it by effective counter-punching.

You utter twat cunt!

Arreola is better than Foreman?

Foreman would batter Adamek and Stiverne!

Adamek did indeed move up from light heavy yes.

So could all those other better skilled heavies.

Your argument is utterly fucking pointless.

If we could transport all those fighters to here and now in their primes and give them a year with our training and "suppliments" that allow fighters to move up in weight and still look like body builders then todays division would look like what it is. A pile of shit.

Right now the Foreman that wiped out Norton and Frazier would scare the living shit out of Wlad!

If the young Foreman was transported now and put in with Arreola, he'd love to face him as he's so fucking easy to hit. If Adamek, an ex light heavy can hurt Arreola, Foreman will wipe him out!

Joey Abell made Arreola's legs go before he got stopped himself.

Rather than worry aout me becoming a boxer, maybe you should try watching some

[Max Power]

Let's have some other facts.. Adamek never HURT Arreola, he just beat him in a boxing match.

Foreman however was STOPPED by former CW Muhammad Ali.

Foreman was STOPPED by former CW Jimmy Young.

Foreman was floored multiple times by Lyle who whilst a hard hitter for the day, was no Arreola!

Foreman was slow and could barely even box! Conversely Arreola is a good boxer and pretty fast!

And the workrate! Ha. Arreola can punch all night at afast pace, Foreman gasses after a few rounds and wings shots out of the field. Those tactics are fine when your oppoennts are tomato cans like Fraxier, Roman and Norton, but any form of durable opponent, something more is required.

When he met Holyfield and Morrison, SUDDENLY he wasn't quite the thrashing machine!

I mean can you really see Jimmy Young in with Chris Arreola?? KO1 is my prediction!!