Re: Gene Tunney is not an all time great HW

Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
I don't rate any white guy who never fought a black fighter, ESPECIALLY at HW. So many times he gets put in people's top 10s. Yuck.
Lately I'm hearing about how great Gene was, how he was one of the most skilled HW's of all time. Rubbish. Someone told me he was more skilled than Wlad Klitschko. I posted a vid of Gene and asked anyone to tell me what he did better than Wlad and no one said a god damn thing.
He's best known for splitting a bunch of fights with Greb (who, btw, was a real man, and apparently had no problems fighting black fighters and bigger fighters), and beating Jack Dempsey twice. Jack Dempsey was washed up at the time, and was overrated anyway. He's another guy who ducked black fighters (he had a tough fight with John Lester Johnson and retired from fighting black fighters apparently).
I don't rate any white guy who refused to fight blacks, much less in the top 10.
Enough with Tunney! He wasn't that good.
I forget any previous history with you and unsure of your stance on "nostalgia" etc.
But on this topic you have nailed every point and I could not agree more.
For the era he had a great record. But "RESUME" wise (record-bums) he is not impressive enough to make the top 10 by achievement standards.
Some great boxers ducked all or most southpaws in their careers, that's 1 thing. Ducking all black fighters is preposterous!
There'll be some who claim "Oh, but that was the times then, it was normal to duck all black fighters", I say stiff shit! If you can't fight them, you can't beat them!
When your best win is a shot Jack Dempsey who ducked all blacks and all hard punchers, you have no
claim to a toplist.
And "Tunney more skilled than Klitshko" PLEASE! The most perfected technical boxer-puncher in history is less skilled than 100 year old boxer from the "drunken era"? GTFOOH!
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
Bookmarks