John Boehner is an a******

[brocktonblockbust]

I do not support President Obama very much. I believe he is perhaps the worst president United States has ever had. however the fact that a congressperson even if he is the majority leader has invited the Israeli prime minister to speak before Congress without President Obama's invitation or blessing or permissionis probably one of the most divisive and a****** things that John Boehner could have done. This was an absolute political theater and absolute disgrace. Do you remember when the Israeli prime minister showed us that stupid drawing of a bomb with a wick which was lit and burning. What a complete sack of s*** Benjamin Netanyahu is. This was a complete sack of s*** event and it is embarrassing and demeaning and humiliating to the United States of America.

[El Kabong]

Obama is a petulant spoiled little brat with 0 to show for his foreign policy bar getting Bin Laden (which he never would have gotten without the info from W).

The American left is so dead fucking focused on "the fundamental transformation" of America they have no time for issues like ISIS or Benghazi or a nuclear Iran, they have NO time for it.


Boehner is worthless because he folds every time he should take a stand

[SlimTrae]

Boehner is a champ at losing. he got kicked out as chairman of the House Republican Conference in 1998, And the only reason why he got this position was during the Republican scandal fest when Tom Delay stepped down...then Dennis Hastert who stepped down.
He is so ineffective at uniting, he narrolwy escaped being kicked out by his own damn party with 25 votes to kick him out. 29 were needed in order to choose a new speaker Boehner responded by removing those who opposed him from influential committees- This was the most no votes cast against a speaker in the last century.

And the Tea Party? Shit, they can't stand his ass either -So Boehner is unable to unite Tea Partiers with the Tea Party (establishment) let alone the Republican party, let alone the House he's the majority in.

Boehner couldnt even stop his own team, from voting against a bill- these muthasuckas, started!
STUNNER: House GOP Votes Down Own Bill To Avert Shutdown

& to his allegiance to making Obama look incapable, he and his team have voted several times against their own shit...whenever Obama said..Ok fuckit...show me whatcha got..
10 ideas Republicans loved until Barack Obama became President | Eclectablog
Boehner then leads the call, to say...well now that the Prez likes it? Shit, we hate it.

Boehner has stood up for what he believes in: and thats obstruction.

[SlimTrae]

As stated in this thread- bringing Netanwhats his name ,is proof of how much he disdains the prez, until its personal.

So that means everyone can follow in his shoes...Hate the prez in 2016? Then start meetings without them. This level of childishness, has shown how fucked up Congress is.

It may have been a do-nothing congress when Dems ran it, but under Republican Boehner its a dowhat thefuck hurts the other party-congress.

[El Kabong]

Yeah when the Democrats ran Congress they NEEEEEEVER undermined W



NOOOOOOOOO of course not

[SlimTrae]

Yeah when the Democrats ran Congress they NEEEEEEVER undermined W



NOOOOOOOOO of course not

What is your point? Why must you always bring up the antithesis of a post? I responded to the post: Why Boehner is an A*****
Once again, what does Democrats have to do with Boehner being an A****?
Let me guess: nothing, you just like to express your position on Democrats.

[SlimTrae]

This was an absolute political theater and absolute disgrace. Do you remember when the Israeli prime minister showed us that stupid drawing of a bomb with a wick which was lit and burning. What a complete sack of s*** Benjamin Netanyahu is. This was a complete sack of s*** event and it is embarrassing and demeaning and humiliating to the United States of America.

Agreed. Obama being less than presidential- to which I agree, has its place, so, too does Dem-witted Democrats, but appropriately- this aint that kinda thread.

[El Kabong]

It shows the undermining of a President during war time by the Majority Leader in the Senate which was pretty much unprecedented...."The War is lost" while our troops are in harms way and there's nothing wrong with that? Especially considering the zeal with which the same congress people voted FOR the war.

It shows that the Democrats have acted in a similar if not worse manner.

[SlimTrae]

It shows the undermining of a President during war time by the Majority Leader in the Senate which was pretty much unprecedented...."The War is lost" while our troops are in harms way and there's nothing wrong with that? Especially considering the zeal with which the same congress people voted FOR the war.

It shows that the Democrats have acted in a similar if not worse manner.

Most if, not all have given up. I will keep on trying. Again I ask: what does that have to do with this thread? I've read your posts & clearly U have the right as us all to express yourself. I am just stumped on what expression here...deals with this here---->>>John Boehner is an a******
Feel free to talk about the topic G, money.

[SlimTrae]

And just remember when Bush went to war- It was a Democratic majority that gave him the powers, but feel free to omit it.

[El Kabong]

And just remember when Bush went to war- It was a Democratic majority that gave him the powers, but feel free to omit it.

#1 The Democrats gained Senate Majority in 2008 well after the War had been declared. Yes Democrats were HEAVILY in favor of action in Iraq: Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, damn near 100% of the base of the party and that zeal was drummed up in 1998 when those people wished to attack then candidate George W. Bush politically by saying that former President George H.W. Bush was "too soft" on Saddam Hussein. Shortly after 2001 those same vociferous Democrats that were gung ho about the war started to undermine George W. Bush, the election was rigged, he's stupid, he's a bumbling idiot, etc etc. and why? Well because right after 9/11 W's poll numbers were outrageously high and to Democrats who narrowly lost election in 2000, that was politically very scary.

#2 The OP said Boehner is an asshole, but also went on to say his moves were divisive and unprecedented. I merely pointed out similar divisive and unprecedented actions taken by Harry Reid in order to spark a compare and contrast debate.

#3 George W. Bush, whom I'm no true fan of to be quite honest, had a VERY different attitude in office than President Obama. W was repeatedly and maliciously attacked, not just as a politician but as a person same with Sarah Palin in 2008 to the present day (again, whom I really don't care for), same with Dick Cheney (likewise, not a fan), same with Condi Rice, personal salacious attacks calling each of them: Stupid, evil, dumb, retarded, conniving, fascist, etc day in day out by not only their political opponents but members of the media....the very same members of the media who routinely protect President Obama from ANY attack political or otherwise. So 2000-2008 the media looked like it wanted to manufacture dissent, 2009-2015 the media has looked to quell dissent and I'm sorry I don't want the media playing favorites anymore than I want politicians playing favorites it's not an honest way to do the jobs they are in.

[walrus]

I like Boehner, seems like a nice guy. I loved George Bush and wish he could have been ruler for life.

[SlimTrae]

And just remember when Bush went to war- It was a Democratic majority that gave him the powers, but feel free to omit it.

#1 The Democrats gained Senate Majority in 2008 well after the War had been declared. Yes Democrats were HEAVILY in favor of action in Iraq: Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, damn near 100% of the base of the party and that zeal was drummed up in 1998 when those people wished to attack then candidate George W. Bush politically by saying that former President George H.W. Bush was "too soft" on Saddam Hussein. Shortly after 2001 those same vociferous Democrats that were gung ho about the war started to undermine George W. Bush, the election was rigged, he's stupid, he's a bumbling idiot, etc etc. and why? Well because right after 9/11 W's poll numbers were outrageously high and to Democrats who narrowly lost election in 2000, that was politically very scary.

#2 The OP said Boehner is an asshole, but also went on to say his moves were divisive and unprecedented. I merely pointed out similar divisive and unprecedented actions taken by Harry Reid in order to spark a compare and contrast debate.

#3 George W. Bush, whom I'm no true fan of to be quite honest, had a VERY different attitude in office than President Obama. W was repeatedly and maliciously attacked, not just as a politician but as a person same with Sarah Palin in 2008 to the present day (again, whom I really don't care for), same with Dick Cheney (likewise, not a fan), same with Condi Rice, personal salacious attacks calling each of them: Stupid, evil, dumb, retarded, conniving, fascist, etc day in day out by not only their political opponents but members of the media....the very same members of the media who routinely protect President Obama from ANY attack political or otherwise. So 2000-2008 the media looked like it wanted to manufacture dissent, 2009-2015 the media has looked to quell dissent and I'm sorry I don't want the media playing favorites anymore than I want politicians playing favorites it's not an honest way to do the jobs they are in.

Let's see if I can get the picture you've painted:
Overview
Post # 2 : Benjamin Netanyahu & the event mentioned as a political theatre- deemed as divisive. Mentioned zero times on your post # 2

Post # 5 a video-not about Benjamin Netanyahu & the event again- NOT mentioned as a political theatre- deemed as divisive is mentioned zero times on post #5

Post #8 Benjamin Netanyahu & the event mentioned as a political theatre-AGAIN is omitted for the time frame we today call the past. You now detail the war. What does WAR have to do with a comparison to what this thread deemed as divisive? I admit I don't get the comparison. End result the topic is mentioned zero times on post # 8 at least from my POV.

Post #11 Benjamin Netanyahu & the event..ONCE AGAIN NOT mentioned by you. Nor the question of the event as being called political theatre- deemed as divisive. Rather you claim to be no fan of Boehner and to prove it? The next sentence goes on the attack of Democrats—with this here: but here's how I see it if politics is like basketball then the Republicans and Democrats both commit fouls but the Democrats are like ...

So you detail what you loathe, disdain and hate about Democrats as I stated in another thread: You use a meticoulous microscopic glass treatment to find the molehill that can be magnified to a mountain. Then when one wants to learn/know/understand why you are not a fan of Boehner..where can they find it? Not in this thread, this folder hell, not at this site known as Saddo Boxing from what I have seen so far.

Post # 12- You start this post on a thread about Benjamin-with a paragrah about democrats, why? Please don't answer its a rhetorical question, Im gonna need some Tylenol if U do asnwer!!

Then you mentioned that OP said Boehner was an asshole. My Point? You dont call him that ...so you give that honor to someone else. Then you injected Harry Reid…Post #12
...
mi mano…
Harry Reid is in a thread about Benjamin? See, at this point: don’t even mentioned Ben’s name now. It would seem disengenous.

Then your 3rd point on that post claims to be no fan of Bush, then rather explain it- U seemingly defend Palin, Cheney with an accusation that they had adjectives hurled at them with the likes of: Stupid, evil, dumb, retarded, conniving, fascist

Yet, you omitted why they had thoe adjective hurled at them. Pssst. Would you like me to list some individuals who made those claims and weren’t Democrats? Let alone politicians or liberal commentators? Just say it and I can, but I would be going your route: down a rabbit hole.

Post #15- once again nothing about said topic Sounded like a one sentence-barb at Eric. The very thing you claim Democrats do, you seem to be a professor at it.

[El Kabong]

I'm no Boehner fan at all but here's how I see it if politics is like basketball then the Republicans and Democrats both commit fouls but the Democrats are like Duke they will flop and play act whenever it suits them they have been much worse under President Obama then they were under Clinton they have used the race card until it has meant nothing at all. Have the Republicans been obstructive? Sure but no more than usual. the Democrats treated George W Bush horribly because they were afraid of his popularity after 9/11 and I do not fault them but don't try to tell me that the Republicans are being worse to President Obama because they are not the media would not allow them to get away with it.

[brocktonblockbust]

I like Trevor Berbick and wish he could have been heavyweight champion into the nineties. Could you imagine a prime Trevor Berbick against a prime Busta Douglas. How about a prime Trevor Berbick vs a prime Evander Holyfield. Now that would have been a large tree for evan fields to chop down juiced up or not