Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 50

Thread: The Fight: Walrus vs SlimTrae (Political Objectivity)

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    698
    Cool Clicks

    Default The Fight: Walrus vs SlimTrae (Political Objectivity)

    Only post historical threads-claiming U alone call out both parties- and I don't.
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    698
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Fight: Walrus vs SlimTrae (Political Objectivity)

    posted- 01-27-2015 08:18 PM

    Mondale & Dukakis

    Pretty bad when a person runs for the highest office in the land and leaves no footprint, no lasting impression other than he was the V.P.

    By the time Dems were advancing ERA and women's rights--it turned IMO more from women's rights to dyke rights. Lesbianic...(I<--- like that word) issues took the front and women in general took the back seat.

    Mondale had nothing to separate himself from in terms of the rest of the Democrats.
    Foreign affairs- I think he flipped on Vietnam. He was for it under Johnson, then against it under Nixon.

    Dukakis to me was the dude who beat out Gore and Rev Jesse Jackson..to show how much talent the Dems had to choose from
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    698
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Fight: Walrus vs SlimTrae (Political Objectivity)

    Excerpts from 01-27-2015 08:18 PM
    How Slim views Democratic President Bill Clinton- calling out Dems by name and not by generalizing

    Protested against Vietnam- How should history hold those who protested a war?

    Clinton's biggest issue to me was Mena Arkansas base- Revealed to have had drug runs used there. Clinton claimed he had no clue and it was a federal issue.

    It was CIA ran, so why did this issue die? Had Republicans went after this the way they would end up going after Paula Jones & Monica Lewinsky- Clinton would have been forced out as Governor-thus never making it to the white house. Word had it-Clinton would drop dime on Repub's involved, so it died right there


    - Hillary & Bill both were questioned on their business dealings, once again they would not be implicated- did they have dime dropping capabilities?

    Clinton IMO won the POTUS because the Republican Party got high jacked by High-strung Neo-cons posing as Compassionate Conservatives which polarized various demographics with a divisive message.




    IMO- Clinton won the 1992 presidency because Neocons alienated way too many demographics

    America as a whole was embarrassed as hell. Knowing all the criminal shit Clinton was accused of ; went unpunished-- Yet when he was brought to justice it was over some head...in the Oval Office.

    The Government was shut down under his presidency.
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    698
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Fight: Walrus vs SlimTrae (Political Objectivity)

    02-02-2015 02:54 PM
    responding to Beanflicker on voting for Democrats during Clinton's tenure

    BF states: I voted for Shirley Chisholm.

    I responded:

    I would've voted for Shirley Temple over these clowns.


    (interested to know Walrus the objective one-) where are your posts with adjectives describing Republicans?
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    698
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Fight: Walrus vs SlimTrae (Political Objectivity)

    So I don't call out both parties on B.S. but you do? Okay

    my take on Hillary- 02-18-2015 08:52 PM

    [edit]
    Hillary lies is costing us laughs.

    Responding to Kabong

    Not sure if my sources are different from yours. But on the Dodging sniper fire story- I got mines from Sinbad the comedian. My last boxing site it was in my signature.
    Sin bad quipped:

    "So Bill Clinton saves the day by saying baby, I can't go to Bosnia, so will you go? Oh and take a singer and comedian with you."
    (Sheryl Crow & Sinbad)
    I think...that is how her story got debunked. by Sinbad the comedian

    Reporters joked on trail about Sinbad story - - POLITICO.com

    Am I defending her? No reason to have ever asked me if I was gonna vote for Hillary-
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    698
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Fight: Walrus vs SlimTrae (Political Objectivity)

    I will honor, respect and commend all historical posts you have (Walrus) showing what you think about Republican politicians that haven't met your expectation- BY NAME or EVENT/ Not by vague ambiguous comments.
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

  7. #7
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: The Fight: Walrus vs SlimTrae (Political Objectivity)

    Quote Originally Posted by SlimTrae View Post
    02-02-2015 02:54 PM
    responding to Beanflicker on voting for Democrats during Clinton's tenure

    BF states: I voted for Shirley Chisholm.

    I responded:

    I would've voted for Shirley Temple over these clowns.


    (interested to know Walrus the objective one-) where are your posts with adjectives describing Republicans?
    Interestingly enough Shirley Temple was a Republican Senator in her post Hollywood career




    ....not to restart this flame war or anything

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    698
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Fight: Walrus vs SlimTrae (Political Objectivity)

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SlimTrae View Post
    02-02-2015 02:54 PM
    responding to Beanflicker on voting for Democrats during Clinton's tenure

    BF states: I voted for Shirley Chisholm.

    I responded:

    I would've voted for Shirley Temple over these clowns.


    (interested to know Walrus the objective one-) where are your posts with adjectives describing Republicans?
    Interestingly enough Shirley Temple was a Republican Senator in her post Hollywood career




    ....not to restart this flame war or anything
    Me stating I'd vote for Shirly T- and U coming back that she was a politician- Republican at that! was like a nice counter shot. Not a Power shot, but a clean jab.
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. "It's half past Timeless on my old Orange Clock" by SlimTrae
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-04-2015, 11:21 PM
  2. Walrus 1000th post
    By Master in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-17-2014, 11:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing