Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather

[bzkfn]

Khan: I'd Be 100-0 If I Cherry Picked Like Mayweather - Boxing News

People hate Khan because he says dumb things like this. Floyd's resume is much better than Khan's and he has 3 losses on his record. Prescott was also a cherry pick to keep his record going, and he got flattened in a round. I'm on the fence about Khan but he's been cherry picking soft punchers for the last few years to try and keep a Mayweather shot alive. If you're going to goad Floyd, use something with a bit of truth in it.

[Beanflicker]

Guys that beat Khan - Prescott, Garcia, Peterson - Floyd would have obliterated.

Khan's a great one to talk about cherry picking. His last fight was against a guy coming off a brutal beating at the hands of Pac... and he gave Khan a very tough fight!

[Jimanuel Boogustus]

The way I see it; Kahn is a player and a player-hater. That's the lame part of it.
Delusion in boxing is fine but it doesn't mix well with obsession. Kahn needs to focus on Khan before Khan goes full blown loopy with it.

Me, myself; I won't call Floyd a cherry picker but he has 'managed' his career exceptionally well.

Lotta subtext there

[p4pking]

Khan may have still been knocked out a few times if he literally picked cherries for a living.

[Master]

Khan has not got the fight with Floyd so now he is not bothering being diplomatic and just throwing the toys out of his pram.

Good for him.

Now watch if Brooks says a derogatory comment about Khan, Amir will not fight him claiming he is being disrespected.

[bzkfn]

If you read that article he says undefeated records mean nothing and uses Cesar Cuenca to support his theory. He says he doesn't know who he is an asks "who is he?"

The answer to that question is that a guy who is 48-0 with only 2KO's is probably the favourite to be Khan's next opponent

[VG_Addict]

Khan said that "the legitimacy of your opponents is what matters".

Oh, you mean like ancient Collazo, ancient Barrera, ancient Diaz, Alexander who had already lost to Porter and Bradley, and had gifts over Matthysse and Kotelnik, and Algieri, who got floored six times by Pacquiao?

Floyd's resume absolutely SHITS on Khan's.

[Beanflicker]

If you read that article he says undefeated records mean nothing and uses Cesar Cuenca to support his theory. He says he doesn't know who he is an asks "who is he?"

The answer to that question is that a guy who is 48-0 with only 2KO's is probably the favourite to be Khan's next opponent

Nice!

So I guess Khan is happy he got KTFO by Prescott and Garcia, then. It somehow makes him a better fighter that those fights happened.

I know one thing, if he was undefeated... he'd have gotten that Mayweather fight. So I guess undefeated records do matter, in this case anyway.

[Master]

If you read that article he says undefeated records mean nothing and uses Cesar Cuenca to support his theory. He says he doesn't know who he is an asks "who is he?"

The answer to that question is that a guy who is 48-0 with only 2KO's is probably the favourite to be Khan's next opponent

Nice!

So I guess Khan is happy he got KTFO by Prescott and Garcia, then. It somehow makes him a better fighter that those fights happened.

I know one thing, if he was undefeated... he'd have gotten that Mayweather fight. So I guess undefeated records do matter, in this case anyway.

Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there.

[Beanflicker]

Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there.

Yeah but come on now, Amir has a much bigger name value than those guys and his name value would be that much bigger if he hadn't lost those fights. You Brits would still be fawning over him and demanding a fight with Floyd and it would happen.

[Beanz]

Khan may have still been knocked out a few times if he literally picked cherries for a living.

This is one of the funniest posts for a long time..... But..

Khan had always said stupid stuff, and yes he is vulnerable, but

He is courageous and brave as well as stupid. He, like Master said took on all comers at light welter and when he does get clocked in a fight he jumps right back in there. The fact that he never rematched Presscot seems to be s black mark that everyone had hanging over him, but actually his team did well in rebuilding him by facing other fighters after that. He like everyone would love to fight Floyd for the wonga and kudos, even in defeat. He certainly is more relevant than Berto however you spin it.

[erics44]

Khan: I'd Be 100-0 If I Cherry Picked Like Mayweather - Boxing News

People hate Khan because he says dumb things like this. Floyd's resume is much better than Khan's and he has 3 losses on his record. Prescott was also a cherry pick to keep his record going, and he got flattened in a round. I'm on the fence about Khan but he's been cherry picking soft punchers for the last few years to try and keep a Mayweather shot alive. If you're going to goad Floyd, use something with a bit of truth in it.

Khan is a bit of a bellend at times, mayweather is a lot of a bellend all of the time