Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    234
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    753
    Cool Clicks

    Default Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    Reports on sky sports say this could be the oppent for very 1s favourite pikeys American debut.what do you guys make iv this?oviously there will be a huge height and weight advantage to fury but is this a potential dangerous oppent? I personally don't think so but hopfully Cunningham will be hungry and looking to win not just surviving like Johnson

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Brack Vegas
    Posts
    1,399
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1119
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Yawn...picking on another non punching heavyweight (ex cruiser).....lol...can't wait

    job biscuit (hope u sensed his sarcasim)!!!

    eh eh!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    Padding out his record against non punchers , Fury's team know he has no chin , thats why they try to make fights like this one.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1864
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Padding out his record against non punchers , Fury's team know he has no chin , thats why they try to make fights like this one.
    i dont agree with that, I think Cunnigham would be a great win for Fury, its clearly the best fighter Fury has fought and hes still learning the trade. Its a step up in class and after the Adameck peformance it will be things into perspective if Fury can compete with top heavyweights.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    Tyson Fuy is shit. This tall gypsy wouldn't even fight an old James Toney. Tyson Fury is such a chicken that I would put him in a battery farm and cut off his head personally. James Toney would rip him up.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1864
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Tyson Fuy is shit. This tall gypsy wouldn't even fight an old James Toney. Tyson Fury is such a chicken that I would put him in a battery farm and cut off his head personally. James Toney would rip him up.
    Toney is too old and and a has been, Fury doesnt need to waste time with Toney. Hes just a name now, not a force in the division.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Barnsley
    Posts
    234
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    685
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    .
    i dont agree with that, I think Cunnigham would be a great win for Fury, its clearly the best fighter Fury has fought and hes still learning the trade. Its a step up in class and after the Adameck peformance it will be things into perspective if Fury can compete with top heavyweights.
    Disagree completely. Clearly the best Fury has fought? Based on what? He's a washed up cruiser with no power and is tailor made for Fury.
    Adamek hasn't been the fighter since Vitali gave him a beating, and Cunningham took advantage of that and I thought nicked the fight. I still wouldn't give Cunningham a spot in the top twenty based on one fight against a light heavy who looked out of his depth against the champion.
    Cunningham has managed three knockouts in his last 19 fights. How is that any preparation to fight the two heaviest hitters in the division that are the brothers K?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1864
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobthepen View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    .
    i dont agree with that, I think Cunnigham would be a great win for Fury, its clearly the best fighter Fury has fought and hes still learning the trade. Its a step up in class and after the Adameck peformance it will be things into perspective if Fury can compete with top heavyweights.
    Disagree completely. Clearly the best Fury has fought? Based on what? He's a washed up cruiser with no power and is tailor made for Fury.
    Adamek hasn't been the fighter since Vitali gave him a beating, and Cunningham took advantage of that and I thought nicked the fight. I still wouldn't give Cunningham a spot in the top twenty based on one fight against a light heavy who looked out of his depth against the champion.
    Cunningham has managed three knockouts in his last 19 fights. How is that any preparation to fight the two heaviest hitters in the division that are the brothers K?
    I don't see how he's washed up, I thought he gave a good account of himself against Adameck and I thought he did enough to win. He's tricky and will give Fury rounds I reckon. Fury could have picked someone a lot worse than Cunnigham IMO. Look at who Boystov is fighting next, that's disgraceful.

    Personally I think Fury needs more fights instead of jumping straight in with one of the brothers, I know he would fight them but he's not ready. He needs more fights like this IMO.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Barnsley
    Posts
    234
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    685
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobthepen View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    .
    i dont agree with that, I think Cunnigham would be a great win for Fury, its clearly the best fighter Fury has fought and hes still learning the trade. Its a step up in class and after the Adameck peformance it will be things into perspective if Fury can compete with top heavyweights.
    Disagree completely. Clearly the best Fury has fought? Based on what? He's a washed up cruiser with no power and is tailor made for Fury.
    Adamek hasn't been the fighter since Vitali gave him a beating, and Cunningham took advantage of that and I thought nicked the fight. I still wouldn't give Cunningham a spot in the top twenty based on one fight against a light heavy who looked out of his depth against the champion.
    Cunningham has managed three knockouts in his last 19 fights. How is that any preparation to fight the two heaviest hitters in the division that are the brothers K?
    I don't see how he's washed up, I thought he gave a good account of himself against Adameck and I thought he did enough to win. He's tricky and will give Fury rounds I reckon. Fury could have picked someone a lot worse than Cunnigham IMO. Look at who Boystov is fighting next, that's disgraceful.

    Personally I think Fury needs more fights instead of jumping straight in with one of the brothers, I know he would fight them but he's not ready. He needs more fights like this IMO.
    You don't see how he's washed up? He looked shot against Hernandez, and at 35 he stepped up to heavyweight because he had no chance of winning a belt back at cruiser, so a few big paydays at heavy before retiring. He is not the fighter he was five years ago, but neither is adamek so it masked it.
    Fury is the one pushing the agenda to fight a Klitchsko this year. I can't think of a worse fighter to gain experience in the run up to a fight with one of the brothers than Cunningham. It's like saying you're fighting Marcus Maidana to prepare you for the speed and technique of a Mayweather bout.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1864
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobthepen View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobthepen View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    .
    i dont agree with that, I think Cunnigham would be a great win for Fury, its clearly the best fighter Fury has fought and hes still learning the trade. Its a step up in class and after the Adameck peformance it will be things into perspective if Fury can compete with top heavyweights.
    Disagree completely. Clearly the best Fury has fought? Based on what? He's a washed up cruiser with no power and is tailor made for Fury.
    Adamek hasn't been the fighter since Vitali gave him a beating, and Cunningham took advantage of that and I thought nicked the fight. I still wouldn't give Cunningham a spot in the top twenty based on one fight against a light heavy who looked out of his depth against the champion.
    Cunningham has managed three knockouts in his last 19 fights. How is that any preparation to fight the two heaviest hitters in the division that are the brothers K?
    I don't see how he's washed up, I thought he gave a good account of himself against Adameck and I thought he did enough to win. He's tricky and will give Fury rounds I reckon. Fury could have picked someone a lot worse than Cunnigham IMO. Look at who Boystov is fighting next, that's disgraceful.

    Personally I think Fury needs more fights instead of jumping straight in with one of the brothers, I know he would fight them but he's not ready. He needs more fights like this IMO.
    You don't see how he's washed up? He looked shot against Hernandez, and at 35 he stepped up to heavyweight because he had no chance of winning a belt back at cruiser, so a few big paydays at heavy before retiring. He is not the fighter he was five years ago, but neither is adamek so it masked it.
    Fury is the one pushing the agenda to fight a Klitchsko this year. I can't think of a worse fighter to gain experience in the run up to a fight with one of the brothers than Cunningham. It's like saying you're fighting Marcus Maidana to prepare you for the speed and technique of a Mayweather bout.
    As I said before there could have been somebody a lot worse that he could have fought. There are clearly better people he could have fought im not denying that, but hes young and its a name to have on Furys record. Its his first fight in the US and Cunnigham is known in America so if Fury impresses he will attract more fans in the US.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    Tam you like fury thats plain to see , but fighting Cunnigham will not improve his power or chin , Fury cant break an egg at top level and his chin is dodgy , so how the fuck is he going to ever make an impact ?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    i personally think its a big step up

    cunningham is world class even at HW as he showed in coming very close to beating adamek

    fury could come unstuck
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    800
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    Quote Originally Posted by rosco1984 View Post
    Reports on sky sports say this could be the oppent for very 1s favourite pikeys American debut.what do you guys make iv this?oviously there will be a huge height and weight advantage to fury but is this a potential dangerous oppent? I personally don't think so but hopfully Cunningham will be hungry and looking to win not just surviving like Johnson

    WOW "Tyson's better than Price as he fights better opponents"

    This was the argument. Fury had a punch bag for his last fight and now he gets the featherfisted Cunningham.

    While Price takes on Thompson who's KO'd 6 of his last 6 wins. Losing only in between to WK.

    Fight a god damn puncher Fury so we can be done with you.

    Fury = Audley II as soon as he fights a puncher.
    Last edited by Vendettos; 01-28-2013 at 11:10 AM.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson fury v Steve cunnigham?

    are there any fans in the world more negative than boxing fans?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1864
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Tam you like fury thats plain to see , but fighting Cunnigham will not improve his power or chin , Fury cant break an egg at top level and his chin is dodgy , so how the fuck is he going to ever make an impact ?
    Time will tell, he's looked better each fight and continues to do so IMO. He's young and learning the trade, he will be a force in a few years and when both Klits are gone I think he will have a chance at winning a title.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Tyson Fury
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-27-2012, 03:31 PM
  2. Tyson Fury
    By Master in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-05-2012, 01:25 AM
  3. Tyson Fury
    By andykopgod in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-30-2010, 11:49 AM
  4. and while we're about it. Tyson Fury
    By Howlin Mad Missy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-28-2009, 02:56 PM
  5. Steve Cunnigham v Marco Huck, Who wins???
    By leftylee in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-21-2007, 09:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing