Beltran just got shafted

[Dark Lord Al]

That was a disgrace ,Burns should be an ex champion , out worked , out fought , Beltran landed all the clean correct shots , and they came up with a draw ?
Disgrace.

[Bo-Bo24]

The subdued atomosphere from his home crowd says it all

[DannyV297]

Burns won rounds 1 and 12 , tjats it. Beltran did plenty enough to win that UD, Burns corner was close to stopping it. Terrible.

[Vendettos]

I scored it 114-114

Most of the pundits scored it close.

Not that bad a decision.

Beltran missed a lot with all those flurrys on the ropes.



However burns should have been deducted for holding, if he had, I'd have scored it to Beltran.

[CFH]

I scored it 114-114

Most of the pundits scored it close.

Not that bad a decision.

Beltran missed a lot with all those flu try's on the ropes.



However burns should have been deducted for holding, if he had, I'd have scored it to Beltran.

I asked this more generally in the other thread, but how can you score it 114-114 when there was one kd?

[Dark Lord Al]

I scored it 114-114

Most of the pundits scored it close.

Not that bad a decision.

Beltran missed a lot with all those flurrys on the ropes.



However burns should have been deducted for holding, if he had, I'd have scored it to Beltran.

You are Scottish

[DannyV297]

If ray did anything wrong, it's that he wasn't aggressive enough when he had burns hurt, but he won every bit of 8-9 rounds. I would even give you that burns won 11-12 but after the first round , Burns had nothing. Terrible robbery

[Vendettos]

I scored it 114-114

Most of the pundits scored it close.

Not that bad a decision.

Beltran missed a lot with all those flurrys on the ropes.



However burns should have been deducted for holding, if he had, I'd have scored it to Beltran.

You are Scottish

Haha.

10-10 round CFH

[CFH]

I scored it 114-114

Most of the pundits scored it close.

Not that bad a decision.

Beltran missed a lot with all those flurrys on the ropes.



However burns should have been deducted for holding, if he had, I'd have scored it to Beltran.

You are Scottish

Haha.

10-10 round CFH

Math and spatial reasoning are not exactly my forte, but does that mean you had Burns winning 6 rounds in addition to the 10-10 round?

[gest12645]

I had it 114-113 Beltran. Had Burns winning 5-2 after 7 , but Beltran dominated from that point on. Close fight but Beltran at least should have won himself a rematch in Mexico.

[Violent Demise]

I scored it 114-114

Most of the pundits scored it close.

Not that bad a decision.

Beltran missed a lot with all those flurrys on the ropes.



However burns should have been deducted for holding, if he had, I'd have scored it to Beltran.

Nobody gives a fuck about your card. You can't fucking score.

[Violent Demise]

I had it 114-113 Beltran. Had Burns winning 5-2 after 7 , but Beltran dominated from that point on. Close fight but Beltran at least should have won himself a rematch in Mexico.

Ha! Burns doesn't have the balls to rematch in Mexico. Or the US.

[IamInuit]

That was a disgrace ,Burns should be an ex champion , out worked , out fought , Beltran landed all the clean correct shots , and they came up with a draw ?
Disgrace.

Gotta agree. There is no word really between getting the nod in a close one like say Quartey/Oscar and robbery. This was not a close fight.

[toe2toe]

Draw by robbery.

[ElTerribleMorales]

I had it 114-113 Beltran. Had Burns winning 5-2 after 7 , but Beltran dominated from that point on. Close fight but Beltran at least should have won himself a rematch in Mexico.

Ha! Burns doesn't have the balls to rematch in Mexico. Or the US.

well unlike your boy Ortiz he went the full 12 rounds with a broken jaw, he didn't quit in a fight he was winning to pretty much a nobody, so wouldn't talk too much shit if I was you lol