The most recent example:
http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...ml#post1221048
Kirkland what is your point? What am I not supposed to have responded too? Your flippant and repellant misogynistic stupidity? If you think making outrageous statements scapegoating a generic group like "single mothers" deserves a response then maybe you should be clear about why you have left out absent selfish irresponsible fathers from your equation. That is the whole point of this thread perspective and assumption. You have to ignorantly assume that I am so stupid and pc to be defending those who have no intention of working to reach such a conclusion.
Don't try and turn it around Kirkland. Threatening to eviscerate women which you did is extreme, suggesting you were grandstanding by doing so is not. Appealing to peoples base instincts for revenge is pretty low as is your suggestion that I have anywhere, in any thread said it's ok for people to decide to not work and live off the state. Assumptions.
Obviously if they're disabled or mentally ill then they should be looked after. I'm talking about the hundreds of thousands of people who have nothing wrong with them but choose to live off the state.
Yes. You might have noticed that I've been making that point for seven or so years now.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks