i think he means its coldOriginally Posted by wacko3205
![]()
i think he means its coldOriginally Posted by wacko3205
![]()
nice quote mate ! well saidOriginally Posted by Scrap
This is how I feel, I say the hell with the United Nations B.S. what a joke that is !
I liked it better in the Regan years, It was simple and effective , We hook up with the Brits and kick some country ass ! Now that’s how you get things done,
Regan and Thatcher, now that was a good team there !
Well let me rephrase thatOriginally Posted by X
THE RIGHT PEOPLE didn't realize how difficult it would be to hold the country together
Also the tiny army thing was an ok idea but it needed to be tested somewhere smaller and less important than IRAQ...you mess with Islam and it's like spraying water on a hornets' nest! Those fuckers are crazy as hell
Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Yeah that's fairly obvious....your pointOriginally Posted by X
I mean at least losing 2,000+ SOLDIERS is better than losing more and more CIVILIANS....yeah we kill their civilians but at least I am not in danger...my family isn't in danger, my friends aren't in danger UNLESS they VOLUNTEER for it.
In WWII 2,000 soldiers wasn't bad to lose in YEARS it was a reality that they were losing thousands A MONTH, A DAY, or A BATTLE...look at D-Day, Battle of the Bulge, and so on...War ain't for the feint of heart...we need MORE soldiers there if any progress is going to be made. War isn't something you do half assed RUMSFELD!!!
You'd think it was fairly obvious, but the idiot US Govt didn't understand it, and they dragged our idiot lapdog governement into an unwinnable conflict.
Come on Lyle, you seem to think it's OK that we kill their civilians .... then you say that you are not in danger. The very fact that we do kill thir civilians is what puts us in danger from radicalised suicide bombers.
I'm disappointed that you think it'd OK to lose 2000 soldiers, obviously you have never served in an army or been anywhere near a front line or combat zone. That does cheapen your argument somewhat and make you come across as a bit of an armchair commentator who gets his opinions off CNN?
I think you view may change if you yourself were lying in a ditch being shelled, or on patrol in a 'Bombing Belt'
*Anyway, sorry Lyle - rant over*
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
CC. You earned it. Though Lyle makes some good points, and his smart ass response to your first post was amusing, I gotta agree with you. Way too many innocent Iraqi civilians have been murdered, and that is what really pisses off the terrorists, radicals etc. Also 1 soldier's life is significant, let alone 2,000. Initally the war in Iraq may have been necessary, but occupying them for this long and losing young men and women every day has just gotten to be senseless IMO. What the Hell are we doing over there ?!Originally Posted by X
"You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"
If I was in the armed forces I might complain for reasons like : not enough armour, not enough troops, etc but it's WAR bombing happens it's like when it rains outside and the rain is wet...it goes together War = Death I mean they don't get to the front lines and thumbwrestle each other or paper, rock, scissors!
Soldiers are people and they are important but it is their JOB to put their lives on the line..like if I was an accountant I would you know do taxes and shit, that would be my JOB that I got PAID FOR. Same with them, if they don't like it they shouldn't have signed up. I myself tried to but alas my asthma has kept me from serving (for the time being, I might just try again). I have friends in Iraq right now my cousin is.....well he's fine unless some suicide bomber is able to hold his breath really long. He's in a sub. Anyways yes I would feel awful if any of them got hurt or died but it's what they do they are soldiers.
What is it with you people and CNN do you know what CNN is called over here "The Communist News Network" it's not a good source of news.
And yeah it's ok that we kill their civilians because they choose to fight with Guerilla tactics and HIDE behind their own people who would not be killed if their "soldiers" if you can call them that, would stand up and fight although I can't blame them for not wanting to it would be over in a matter of minutes. Now the US gets busted on for doing this and that against the "Geneva Convention" but MY WHOLE DEAL IS: The terrorist/Islamo-Fascist/The Enemy don't wear uniforms, don't care about POW's, they do much more against the Geneva Convention than us but it's all the US we have to fight a level above them when in all actuality we could blast the fuck out of the whole region with 1 bomb.
I understand your points but we're over there now and to ensure that things don't get worse we need more troops over there...we needed more to begin with and if the Democrats ever figured out that if we had more troops over there we would be there for a much shorter period of time then I sure as hell would vote for them but the Democrats have no balls and that's why I won't vote for them
you got whuped in 'nam you'll get whuped in Iraq, you've not learnt a damn thing.
I think we The " U.S and Britain " are doing the right thing , Keep the war over there and don't let the terrorist 's country asses off the hook. It's already paying dividends . The Middle East has dangerous leaders , those people got to be dealt with . Listen to Iran's public statements.I mean you can't let that guy get any kind of weapons ! Are you crazy ? think about it ! We need to tap dance on his goofy ass before he gets any further along. !Originally Posted by Missy
I also think every time we have to go Baby Sit one of these rogue nations, we use their oil to pay for the expenses !
Missy did I disturb you from reading your Karl MarxOriginally Posted by Missy
The reasons we went to 'Nam were because 1) The French 2) The US policy to contain Communism...and we didn't get "whipped" we put up a moron who treated people badly and tried to fix that and the Vietnamese who were on our side ended up killing him and his brother.
Right now, WHUPPED....don't make me laugh Missy. We are hardly getting "whupped" We're at a point where the War for Iraq has been won a loooooooooong time ago the rebuilding has taken a long time due to lack of troops and liberal cunts who just oppose any war whatsoever. I'm sorry WE got attacked Missy, we'll try not to next time.
As for the Iraq 1) Deposing Saddam wasn't W's brain child it was BILL CLINTON...W was just stupid enough to go through with it 2) Yes it was WRONG to go there but we are there right now and if we "Want the world to be a better place" for all of Missy's socialist offspring we have to increase the # of troops there and stick with it because it might not mean much to you if we leave but poor little Achmed and Muhamed will be stuck there in the sectarian violence that we all know happens and will that be good? Will you feel better just because Bush and Blair will be wrong? Because they failed? That's all the leftist opposition is, if these leaders were Clinton and whoever is a favorite left winger in UK then everyone would be behind this war they wouldn't be happy about it but they would say "let's do it let's get it over with"
It bothers me that you think that way Missy...seeing how England is the frontline for home grown terrorists. Have that Anti-England Anti-US attitude all you want, I support my country and I want us to come out on top in this war, we need to. I don't like camels, the desert, and NOT eating pork or drinking alcohol.
you aint fit enough tubsOriginally Posted by Lyle
![]()
I'm the real pretty boy
I'm plenty fit!
....I just have to stop drinking
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks