Hearn eyes JMM showdown for Brook

[IamInuit]

A major part of this sport is timing both planned and unplanned and in this case a Marquez fight could not be better. Unplanned but the stars have kind of aligned for this kid. He's even got a registered retirement savings plan with Khan should he fall short in any of his upcoming headline fights. He needs to forget about that though. Seen it in hockey hundreds of times. Guy gets 40 or 50 goals a years, gets multi million dollar contract and takes 3 years off and almost becomes a liability on the ice.

Classic matchup. Boxer/puncher vs boxer/counter puncher. It doesn't get any better then this from a pugilistic stand point. His fight with the flailing Porter has no bearing on this scrap whether you think he looked good or not. I thought he dominated it.

This is not the same Marquez, not by a long shot but its still a great win and not an easy one. He's smart and will take advantage or attempt to of some of the errors that Kell may repeat on a regular basis like stepping straight back with the lead down. Marquez on the other hand has most definitely lost a step or two, looks slower and has spent a lifetime almost training for a darting in southpaw and has almost looked out of sorts with orthodox guys. Kells speed, drive and sharp punching will be to much at this stage. I don't see him going to England though at this stage in his career.

[Master]

JMM is a legend and a great counter puncher but be realistic. He would be facing a young strong undefeated legitimate welterweight and most likely he will lose. Porter fought a horrible fight and Brooks still had enough skill to beat him.

[Dia bando]

I do hope this fight comes off and is this side of the pond,! Brook is a big welter JMM is not
a true welter, a good fight I see Kel winning by KO.
If the fight COMES OFF,and is over here I shall start saving my penny's to see this one.

[Master]

This fight is Khan v Barrera all over again.

[TitoFan]

The Kell Brook who fought Porter loses to Marquez. He's gonna a need a much better performance than that to beat the great Marquez

Bullshit. You don't know what the f*ck you're talking about, favoring your locals as usual. Marquez IS a great. But he's also 41 years old, that's pretty f*cking old for the lighter weights. Brook is at or near his peak at 28. Get off your favs' dicks and try being objective for once in your life. One planking of Pacquiao and suddenly Marquez can beat Father Time? What a dumbass.

[Violent Demise]

The Kell Brook who fought Porter loses to Marquez. He's gonna a need a much better performance than that to beat the great Marquez

Bullshit. You don't know what the f*ck you're talking about, favoring your locals as usual. Marquez IS a great. But he's also 41 years old, that's pretty f*cking old for the lighter weights. Brook is at or near his peak at 28. Get off your favs' dicks and try being objective for once in your life. One planking of Pacquiao and suddenly Marquez can beat Father Time? What a dumbass.

If Kell Brooks fights Marquez the way he fought Shawn Porter he loses the fight. It's that simple. You never even saw the Brooks-Porter fight. So why is you're dumb ass even commenting on it?

[TitoFan]

The Kell Brook who fought Porter loses to Marquez. He's gonna a need a much better performance than that to beat the great Marquez

Bullshit. You don't know what the f*ck you're talking about, favoring your locals as usual. Marquez IS a great. But he's also 41 years old, that's pretty f*cking old for the lighter weights. Brook is at or near his peak at 28. Get off your favs' dicks and try being objective for once in your life. One planking of Pacquiao and suddenly Marquez can beat Father Time? What a dumbass.

If Kell Brooks fights Marquez the way he fought Shawn Porter he loses the fight. It's that simple. You never even saw the Brooks-Porter fight. So why is you're dumb ass even commenting on it?

I saw the fight, dimwit. You're dissing Brook needlessly. Before the Porter fight I'm sure you were betting on Porter getting him the hell out of there. Porter is not a comfortable fight for anybody. Fact is you continue to ride your local boys' members shamelessly, showing your ignorance.

[Violent Demise]

The Kell Brook who fought Porter loses to Marquez. He's gonna a need a much better performance than that to beat the great Marquez

Bullshit. You don't know what the f*ck you're talking about, favoring your locals as usual. Marquez IS a great. But he's also 41 years old, that's pretty f*cking old for the lighter weights. Brook is at or near his peak at 28. Get off your favs' dicks and try being objective for once in your life. One planking of Pacquiao and suddenly Marquez can beat Father Time? What a dumbass.

If Kell Brooks fights Marquez the way he fought Shawn Porter he loses the fight. It's that simple. You never even saw the Brooks-Porter fight. So why is you're dumb ass even commenting on it?

I saw the fight, dimwit. You're dissing Brook needlessly. Before the Porter fight I'm sure you were betting on Porter getting him the hell out of there. Porter is not a comfortable fight for anybody. Fact is you continue to ride your local boys' members shamelessly, showing your ignorance.

Brooks fought a poor fight against Porter. Good thing for him Porter fought an even poorer fight. If Brooks were to fight that way against Marquez he would lose. If that's dissing Brooks needlessly than you're a bigger idiot than I thought you were. And trust me when I tell you I already got you down as a huge fucking idiot to begin with

[TitoFan]

The Kell Brook who fought Porter loses to Marquez. He's gonna a need a much better performance than that to beat the great Marquez

Bullshit. You don't know what the f*ck you're talking about, favoring your locals as usual. Marquez IS a great. But he's also 41 years old, that's pretty f*cking old for the lighter weights. Brook is at or near his peak at 28. Get off your favs' dicks and try being objective for once in your life. One planking of Pacquiao and suddenly Marquez can beat Father Time? What a dumbass.

If Kell Brooks fights Marquez the way he fought Shawn Porter he loses the fight. It's that simple. You never even saw the Brooks-Porter fight. So why is you're dumb ass even commenting on it?

I saw the fight, dimwit. You're dissing Brook needlessly. Before the Porter fight I'm sure you were betting on Porter getting him the hell out of there. Porter is not a comfortable fight for anybody. Fact is you continue to ride your local boys' members shamelessly, showing your ignorance.

Brooks fought a poor fight against Porter. Good thing for him Porter fought an even poorer fight. If Brooks were to fight that way against Marquez he would lose. If that's dissing Brooks needlessly than you're a bigger idiot than I thought you were. And trust me when I tell you I already got you down as a huge fucking idiot to begin with

Remove JMM's member from your oral cavity before it damages what little gray matter there is in your skull. For once in your miserable little life show everyone you're capable of being something other than a subjective, small-minded Neanderthal. Brook (without the "s", moron.... unless you're confusing Kell Brook with Mel Brooks), is in his youthful prime. JMM, as great as he is, is over the proverbial hill. Father Time waits for no man. Now... what would you do without me to humiliate your ignorant ass over and over again?

[erics44]

This fight is Khan v Barrera all over again.

khan barrera was very disapointing

[denilson200]

Juan Manuel Marquez-Kell Brook Eyed By Eddie Hearn - Boxing News

This would be a great fight, I hope it can happen.

Fair play to Hearn for even considering this

Normally after you win the title on away soil, promoters usually give the fighter a soft-ish 1st defence homecoming.

But JMM ? Wow. I know he must be in his 40's but he brings an awesome CV to the ring. Tough-Tough fight for Brook and very risky.

But should he win and win well, then that pushes him to the very front of the Mayweather sweep stakes.

[Master]

Juan Manuel Marquez-Kell Brook Eyed By Eddie Hearn - Boxing News

This would be a great fight, I hope it can happen.

Fair play to Hearn for even considering this

Normally after you win the title on away soil, promoters usually give the fighter a soft-ish 1st defence homecoming.

But JMM ? Wow. I know he must be in his 40's but he brings an awesome CV to the ring. Tough-Tough fight for Brook and very risky.

But should he win and win well, then that pushes him to the very front of the Mayweather sweep stakes.

JMM is a legend and a big name but not a very high risk for Brooks. I do not think they can afford JMM anyway and it is just publicity.

[Violent Demise]

The Kell Brook who fought Porter loses to Marquez. He's gonna a need a much better performance than that to beat the great Marquez

Bullshit. You don't know what the f*ck you're talking about, favoring your locals as usual. Marquez IS a great. But he's also 41 years old, that's pretty f*cking old for the lighter weights. Brook is at or near his peak at 28. Get off your favs' dicks and try being objective for once in your life. One planking of Pacquiao and suddenly Marquez can beat Father Time? What a dumbass.

If Kell Brooks fights Marquez the way he fought Shawn Porter he loses the fight. It's that simple. You never even saw the Brooks-Porter fight. So why is you're dumb ass even commenting on it?

I saw the fight, dimwit. You're dissing Brook needlessly. Before the Porter fight I'm sure you were betting on Porter getting him the hell out of there. Porter is not a comfortable fight for anybody. Fact is you continue to ride your local boys' members shamelessly, showing your ignorance.

Brooks fought a poor fight against Porter. Good thing for him Porter fought an even poorer fight. If Brooks were to fight that way against Marquez he would lose. If that's dissing Brooks needlessly than you're a bigger idiot than I thought you were. And trust me when I tell you I already got you down as a huge fucking idiot to begin with

Remove JMM's member from your oral cavity before it damages what little gray matter there is in your skull. For once in your miserable little life show everyone you're capable of being something other than a subjective, small-minded Neanderthal. Brook (without the "s", moron.... unless you're confusing Kell Brook with Mel Brooks), is in his youthful prime. JMM, as great as he is, is over the proverbial hill. Father Time waits for no man. Now... what would you do without me to humiliate your ignorant ass over and over again?

Let me tell you something. Something everybody already knows. You yourself already know it. But you seem to require constant reminding. Read carefully. You are a fucking idiot. Seriously. You are without a doubt a fucking idiot. That's the best your retarded ass can come up with? He's young. He's old. So the young guy is going to win. Just like in Foreman-Moorer. Ali-Foreman. Hopkins-Pavlik. Casamayor-Katsidis. Duran-Moore. Duran-Barkley. Like I said you are a fucking idiot. I can go on and on. There some many examples I can use to show the stupidity of your moronic post.

And the answer is yes. I still very much enjoy laughing at you

[TitoFan]

The Kell Brook who fought Porter loses to Marquez. He's gonna a need a much better performance than that to beat the great Marquez

Bullshit. You don't know what the f*ck you're talking about, favoring your locals as usual. Marquez IS a great. But he's also 41 years old, that's pretty f*cking old for the lighter weights. Brook is at or near his peak at 28. Get off your favs' dicks and try being objective for once in your life. One planking of Pacquiao and suddenly Marquez can beat Father Time? What a dumbass.

If Kell Brooks fights Marquez the way he fought Shawn Porter he loses the fight. It's that simple. You never even saw the Brooks-Porter fight. So why is you're dumb ass even commenting on it?

I saw the fight, dimwit. You're dissing Brook needlessly. Before the Porter fight I'm sure you were betting on Porter getting him the hell out of there. Porter is not a comfortable fight for anybody. Fact is you continue to ride your local boys' members shamelessly, showing your ignorance.

Brooks fought a poor fight against Porter. Good thing for him Porter fought an even poorer fight. If Brooks were to fight that way against Marquez he would lose. If that's dissing Brooks needlessly than you're a bigger idiot than I thought you were. And trust me when I tell you I already got you down as a huge fucking idiot to begin with

Remove JMM's member from your oral cavity before it damages what little gray matter there is in your skull. For once in your miserable little life show everyone you're capable of being something other than a subjective, small-minded Neanderthal. Brook (without the "s", moron.... unless you're confusing Kell Brook with Mel Brooks), is in his youthful prime. JMM, as great as he is, is over the proverbial hill. Father Time waits for no man. Now... what would you do without me to humiliate your ignorant ass over and over again?

Let me tell you something. Something everybody already knows. You yourself already know it. But you seem to require constant reminding. Read carefully. You are a fucking idiot. Seriously. You are without a doubt a fucking idiot. That's the best your retarded ass can come up with? He's young. He's old. So the young guy is going to win. Just like in Foreman-Moorer. Ali-Foreman. Hopkins-Pavlik. Casamayor-Katsidis. Duran-Moore. Duran-Barkley. Like I said you are a fucking idiot. I can go on and on. There some many examples I can use to show the stupidity of your moronic post.

And the answer is yes. I still very much enjoy laughing at you

Couple of things about your post:

1. First, congrats on putting several coherent sentences together in one post. Those 5th grade remedial classes must be paying off.

2. Second, as usual you twist arguments at your convenience. This all boils down to one thing: I can see objectively beyond a fighter's nationality, whereas you deep throat every Mexican fighter who's ever stepped into a ring. And when I ridicule you, you react with ghetto anger. I saw the Porter fight. Brook performed admirably against a very uncomfortable, high-pressure fighter. Before the fight, you were probably saying how Porter would destroy Brook, as you seem to have it in for UK fighters as well (anybody who's not Mexican). Now after the fight, you do the expected from you..... you dis the other fighter. You are as predictable as you are stupid.


On another note... happy you're back. I thought you and Finito had given each other STD and died.

[TitoFan]

I know you're hovering with itchy little keyboard fingers (and a dictionary), so I'll make this my last response to you today.

I'm actually a fan of JMM. But I guess that escapes your pea-sized brain when you're throwing your ghetto insults around. Think about it.... a fan of a Mexican fighter. Just like I was a fan of Barrera when he was fighting. You see.... I'm capable of such things.

You, on the other hand, cheer for Mexican fighters regardless of whether they deserve it or not.

They cheat (Margarito, JCC Jr.)...... you cheer for them.
They're coddled for the first 40 fights of their career (Canelo)..... you cheer for them.

Everybody here sees right through you. You're as shallow as a baby wading pool.

So I'm a JMM fan. But God forbid I might say he's finally getting old (41 years is ancient for the lighter weights) and that Brook just might have enough talent to beat him....... and I've offended your man. It's a good thing we type, because it would be impossible for you to speak with JMM's manhood being shoved down your throat.


By the way, twerp..... Ali, Foreman, Moorer=heavyweights. These guys can fight till they're damn near 50, and many of them are still trying. Hopkins? Freak of nature. A guy who keeps in shape and is in better shape than some guys half his age. Keep trying.