The judges penalized Cotto...

[ykdadamaja]

... for the same thing Floyd did to Canelo and won, hands down for. Amazing!

There is no true scoring standard in boxing. We need a better alternative to what we have now. It's clear!

[Ron Swanson]

If you think they did the same thing you really need someone to teach you the sport.

[Master]

So did Cotto make Saul miss and counter his head off?

[greynotsoold]

So did Cotto make Saul miss and counter his head off?

No

[imp]

... for the same thing Floyd did to Canelo and won, hands down for. Amazing!

There is no true scoring standard in boxing. We need a better alternative to what we have now. It's clear!

Floyd outboxed canelo, cotto and pac..its not running its being smart and taking minimal punishment.

The judges were wrong but do not compare this to floyd.

[Master]

So did Cotto make Saul miss and counter his head off?

No

Did not think so.

[p4pking]

Lol, did Floyd take a single clean punch in that fight? Not to mention there was that even card, so obviously one judge was at least as hard on him as they were on Cotto last night

119-109 was dumb, but I think 7-5 would have been generous to Cotto myself. After the opening few, almost every round was close but easier to give Canelo imo, just because the cards were wide doesn't mean the judges didn't see a competitive fight.

[Spicoli]

Save for the continual sharpshooting, coming in and going out off the jab and causing Canelo to reset throughout, sure, Cotto did exactly what Mayweather did.

[Gandalf]

Thought it was a draw myself. Cotto was far too sharp early on and banked his share of the early rounds. It could only have been a close fight regardless of who you think won. The cards were schizo.

[Vendettos]

I gave cotto 1 round as a share.

Judges were accurate imo