Is there proper closure over the Brook fight with Golovkin?

[Fenster]

He could have went down, took a knee, or told the ref he quits like several of Golovkin's opponents. He didn't.

If he threw a hissy fit like Zab he'd look the cunt Zab did.

[Fenster]

He was tapping at his eye because it was fucked. He said he was seeing 3 or 4 Golovkin's. How common is it for fighters to constantly tap eye injuries? Nothing unusual.

[Memphis]

I had an odd experience watching this fight. I watched the first three rounds on Sky, lost my stream and then got back into it at the end of the fourth on HBO.

I went from watching Brook give Golovkin the most intriguing nine minutes of his career, to looking at a forlorn Kell Brook in his corner at the end of the fourth looking like he'd shot his bolt and everyone arou d him knew it.

Brook had his moments and I dont care what Golovkin or Sanchez said, he felt some of those clumps.

The fight played out exactly how every man and his dog expected it to. It's comical to see some people taking some kind of credit for calling this one, like they're Mystic fucking Meg or summat.

Brook leaves with plenty of credit, the stoppage was a good one, there was only one outcome from that point and when that's the case, it's always best to bail and fight another day, broken face or no broken face.

Brook goes on to light middle and plenty of opportunities and all these mug cunts who didn't want to fight GGG before hand suddenly find a pair of bollocks and want it now that he's been 'exposed'.

Yeah I'd say theres proper closure alright.