NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

[p4pking]

https://goo.gl/images/cdxRY6


Is that edited?

[Alpha]

https://goo.gl/images/cdxRY6


Is that edited?

Are you comparing a drop to the earth?

It's the same as a drop of water or bubble forming in water. The pressure is equal on all sides.

Try again.

[p4pking]

You have referenced and asked for scale many times, that this fails you just cements why I posted that. It’s the same reason all of your examples about bodies of water fall so short. Do you realize how limited the scope of any camera, laser level that exists are? There is nothing that could measure a blip on the surface of the ocean, of course you won’t see curvature. It would be the same thing if you could imagine a quark sized camera trying to do so over that drop of water.

[TitoFan]

Don't mean to sound simplistic in the midst of this physics mumbo-jumbo..... but the "accepted" fact is that the Earth is spherically-shaped, even if it's an imperfect sphere. We're not living in the Middle Ages, when people feared falling off the edge. We've got planes and satellites that routinely orbit the Earth. There's literally tons of pictures taken from space (if that premise can be believed and accepted as fact, otherwise we're back to the elaborate studio conspiracy theory). Based on this, the onus is on the "Flat-Earthers" to prove the Earth is flat, not the other way around. And "proving" the Earth is flat will take more than some backyard experiments and trying to equate the behavior of a few gallons of water with the behavior of trillions and trillions of tons of water on a huge planet. Scaling does make a difference in experiments, whether some people want to accept it or not.

[Alpha]

Next you'll be showing me water, bubbling on top of a straw. We already know and understand what meniscus and adhesion are.

[p4pking]

You are incredibly dense, but look at what the topic is

[Alpha]

Don't mean to sound simplistic in the midst of this physics mumbo-jumbo..... but the "accepted" fact is that the Earth is spherically-shaped, even if it's an imperfect sphere. We're not living in the Middle Ages, when people feared falling off the edge. We've got planes and satellites that routinely orbit the Earth. There's literally tons of pictures taken from space (if that premise can be believed and accepted as fact, otherwise we're back to the elaborate studio conspiracy theory). Based on this, the onus is on the "Flat-Earthers" to prove the Earth is flat, not the other way around. And "proving" the Earth is flat will take more than some backyard experiments and trying to equate the behavior of a few gallons of water with the behavior of trillions and trillions of tons of water on a huge planet. Scaling does make a difference in experiments, whether some people want to accept it or not.

We'll here's 200 proofs to start with:

[Alpha]

You are incredibly dense, but look at what the topic is

And you can't back up your claims, I love how you always resort to the ad hominem attacks. Just shows how weak your argument is!

[p4pking]

I would normally agree, I hate ad hominem, but what is your argument? Please tell me what scale, that you keep asking for, would do? Mine was way too small. Let’s recreate something the size of the universe then, and see if this holds up? This is a case where ad hominem is the only option

[Alpha]

I would normally agree, I hate ad hominem, but what is your argument? Please tell me what scale, that you keep asking for, would do? Mine was way too small. Let’s recreate something the size of the universe then, and see if this holds up? This is a case where ad hominem is the only option

You showed a picture of a drop of water, I don't even know what to say to that. How is that any sort of scale model?

I'm still only on my first point, and not 1 person who believes in a globe, can show me in this reality, how water bends around the exterior of a shape, like it would on a globe. I haven't even mentioned the spinning. But we all know how water works in this reality. You can see this for yourself. But have been brain washed to believe that the properties of water change at a certain point.

All I keep hearing here is excuses as to why a scale model can't be done. But no one realizing the real reason for this. It's because it's not a reality.

Shall we move onto my 2nd request then?

[TitoFan]

Don't mean to sound simplistic in the midst of this physics mumbo-jumbo..... but the "accepted" fact is that the Earth is spherically-shaped, even if it's an imperfect sphere. We're not living in the Middle Ages, when people feared falling off the edge. We've got planes and satellites that routinely orbit the Earth. There's literally tons of pictures taken from space (if that premise can be believed and accepted as fact, otherwise we're back to the elaborate studio conspiracy theory). Based on this, the onus is on the "Flat-Earthers" to prove the Earth is flat, not the other way around. And "proving" the Earth is flat will take more than some backyard experiments and trying to equate the behavior of a few gallons of water with the behavior of trillions and trillions of tons of water on a huge planet. Scaling does make a difference in experiments, whether some people want to accept it or not.

We'll here's 200 proofs to start with:

Wow. You spend countless pages and posts attempting to assign "science" to the Flat Earth thing, and then you post 200 "proofs" from one of the most ridiculed, owned men in America. So much, in fact, that he's listed in the "Encyclopedia of American Loons". Needless to say, I'm not going to spend 2 hours listening to the ramblings of someone with questionable credentials.

I did look for more info on Dubay, however, and found mostly people exposing him and his theories on YouTube.

Oh and by the way, the map he shows of the Flat Earth is identical to that shown on the clip I earlier posted of the Flat Earth Society Convention. You know, the one with the ice of Antarctica forming the outer edge of the disk you call Earth. So at least the Flat Earthers are consistent on what they think the Earth looks like.

I found interesting how Dubay and rest of the Flat Earthers try and explain the motion of the Sun relative to the Earth. All I have to say to that is....... WOW.

[TitoFan]

I think it's only fair to post one of the many YouTube clips that totally debunk the Flat Earth theory. At least this one isn't 2 hours long.

[walrus]

If it is true I hope I live on the bottom. Wait if I were on the bottom wouldn’t the blood rush to my head?

[Alpha]

Don't mean to sound simplistic in the midst of this physics mumbo-jumbo..... but the "accepted" fact is that the Earth is spherically-shaped, even if it's an imperfect sphere. We're not living in the Middle Ages, when people feared falling off the edge. We've got planes and satellites that routinely orbit the Earth. There's literally tons of pictures taken from space (if that premise can be believed and accepted as fact, otherwise we're back to the elaborate studio conspiracy theory). Based on this, the onus is on the "Flat-Earthers" to prove the Earth is flat, not the other way around. And "proving" the Earth is flat will take more than some backyard experiments and trying to equate the behavior of a few gallons of water with the behavior of trillions and trillions of tons of water on a huge planet. Scaling does make a difference in experiments, whether some people want to accept it or not.

We'll here's 200 proofs to start with:

Wow. You spend countless pages and posts attempting to assign "science" to the Flat Earth thing, and then you post 200 "proofs" from one of the most ridiculed, owned men in America. So much, in fact, that he's listed in the "Encyclopedia of American Loons". Needless to say, I'm not going to spend 2 hours listening to the ramblings of someone with questionable credentials.

I did look for more info on Dubay, however, and found mostly people exposing him and his theories on YouTube.

Oh and by the way, the map he shows of the Flat Earth is identical to that shown on the clip I earlier posted of the Flat Earth Society Convention. You know, the one with the ice of Antarctica forming the outer edge of the disk you call Earth. So at least the Flat Earthers are consistent on what they think the Earth looks like.

I found interesting how Dubay and rest of the Flat Earthers try and explain the motion of the Sun relative to the Earth. All I have to say to that is....... WOW.

You ask for proof, I post a vid that has 200 and you don't want to watch?

Dubay is a genuine truther. Of course you are going to find people trying to debunk him, they are controlled opposition, and paid actors like Degrass Tyson.

I've already told/ showed you how water works in this reality. Again, if your claim is it does something different, then you I'd ask you to show me how it can conform to the exterior of a shape. I can show what I'm saying. Globe believers can't do the same.

[p4pking]

I would normally agree, I hate ad hominem, but what is your argument? Please tell me what scale, that you keep asking for, would do? Mine was way too small. Let’s recreate something the size of the universe then, and see if this holds up? This is a case where ad hominem is the only option

You showed a picture of a drop of water, I don't even know what to say to that. How is that any sort of scale model?

I'm still only on my first point, and not 1 person who believes in a globe, can show me in this reality, how water bends around the exterior of a shape, like it would on a globe. I haven't even mentioned the spinning. But we all know how water works in this reality. You can see this for yourself. But have been brain washed to believe that the properties of water change at a certain point.

All I keep hearing here is excuses as to why a scale model can't be done. But no one realizing the real reason for this. It's because it's not a reality.

Shall we move onto my 2nd request then?

How is it NOT an accurate depiction of a scale model? It’s what you were begging for.....