Pavlick v Calzaghe - who wins?

**ACEA** · 10-01-2007 05:17 PM

1)What does spelling a guys name right have anything to do with knowing about boxing?

2)Do you own this forum?Didn't thinks so there is a certain think called freedom of speech mother f**ker.

3)I never said Calzaghi (i will spell it how the f**k i want) hits hard and he wasn't really hiting Lacy with bombs more like quick flurrys

4)Just because Pavlik beat Taylor doesn't mean he can beat the guys he did. B-hop is a crafty fighter with excenlent defense and Winky is a very good technician with water tight defense and they would give Pavlik all kinds of trouble.

5)Im not a fan of either JT or Pavlik so i aint caressing no balls, JT wasn't exactly in stella form coming in to the fight but he did box well in this fight, Pavlik still has a lot to prove.

6)Manny Steward is full of s**t. Isn't he the same guy who said Prince Naseem was going to be the best fighter in history? Nuff said

Originally Posted by southakron314

Originally Posted by ACEA

Th reason is because Pavlicks defense is poor, JT had a stamina problem so Pavlick was able to back Taylor up and catch him with his powershots. Calzaghi has amazing stamina and good footwork and is quicker than Pavlick so he will get off first. I do agree that he doesnt hit that hard and most of his punches are more like slaps but the simple fact is technically Calzaghi is much better than Pavlick whom is one dimentional and will throw 1-2's with a big right hoping it lands

You are3 just trying to caress Taylors balls. Steward said " I have been training guys since 1961 and I have never scene a better conditioned fighter both mentally and physically as I see in Jermaine".Wait here is the video. Reading this I know you are a complete retard and have no business in this forum. Calzaghe not Calzaghi it Lacy with over 1,000 punches and couldn't finish him. Pavlik landed a fraction of that and look what he did to a guy who went 24 rounds with B-hop. Winky. Spinks,Ouma and other elite. Do you think Joe can beat Bernard.....I don't. Then think of it this way. Pavlik beat the guy who beat Hopkins (one of the best champs at 160 in the history of the sport)twice. Pavlik didn't go the distance he knocked him out. How many times has Taylor been KO'ed
not only that in the middle rounds of the fight. Pavlik is the only one to do that.

**skel1983** · 10-01-2007 05:32 PM

Im suprised so many people fanct Joe, i would be very worried much more than i am with the Kessler fight, Calzaghe loves a tear up and has never backed off from one in his whole career, look at the Lacy fight it took Joe about 1 minute in the fight before he stood there in front of Lacy and was basically saying im up for a scrap matey.

If he did this with Pavlik i think its lights out for Joe. Calzaghe will be nearly 36( well probably will be 36 if the fight is ever made) So he isnt as young as you would like. Pavlik will come all night long and Calzaghe hasnt the power to keep Pavlik off no way.

If Joe boxes clever which he is capable off he wins, but if he gets into a similar situation like he did with Byron Mitchell where is was just a bomb fest!!! I got to say a younger more powerful guy like Pavlik who basically looks like he dont give a fuck who is in the other corner he will just keep coming, will knock him out.