
Originally Posted by
ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by
Althugz

Originally Posted by
ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by
Althugz
I know a lot of you disagree and thats fair enough but I still need proof that Pavlik didn't just win this fight with one big right in the 7th. Also, the match was so good..so why the hell not do it again??
Read an interview where Taylor definitely does want him again.
Are you trying to imply that it was luck ?? if you are then thats crap because it wasn't one right hand that started the trouble it was 2 and they were both perfectly set up.
Oh i'm sorry so it wasn't one punch that did it, it was 2?

whats the difference lol
Like I said I just need to see it once more because I had Taylor up and winning this fight until that moment.
Yes it was 2 right hands the first one had him hurt and then the second one rocked him back into the corner one punch is lucky 2 aren't and especially when its very close fight it isn't luck.
I never ever called it luck in the first place..the thing that impressed me with Pavlik most was his clinical finishing of Taylor. Now my point was he landed the flush right that started Taylor off with the problems..but I and 3 judges had Taylor up until that point. My point being that had Pavlik not landed that killer blow, would he have been able to get himself back into the fight over the course of 12 rounds? Because he was losing..(IMO and 3 judges)
I'm not calling it a 'lucky punch' by any stretch
Bookmarks