Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
What are you talking about?
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
What are you talking about?
In the past i mean.Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan
Because Oscar gave him a boixng lesson and he was luck to get the win lol.
And Mosley beat the most prime Oscar more convincingly then Tito did Tito was lucky he got that win but i wont go into that. And by the way talk you tend to favor Mexican fighters over most and can be bais more towards them when coming to any match up. But i tend to do the same thing when it comes to Leonard,Duran,Hagler,Hearns, and lets not for get Spinks or Holmes so being bais is part of boxing any how.
Mosley does not fight like Oscar. Hell, not even Oscar fights like Oscar did that night. Mosley does not have a good stiff jab, which is one of the key components to beating Tito. He does not move around too much eather. He is a brawler. Yes he is fast, he throws a lot of punches, he is athletic, he might be winning the first half of the fight. But he defenately would get hit by Tito bombs throughout the fight and would eventually retreat with the fight ending in a close yet convincing UD in TIto's favor.
As for the Reid comparison ICB, I don't think I ever compared Mosley to Reid per say, but I do think a fight between Tito and Mosley would be similar to that one in many ways. Cept Mosley would've made it closer and would not have been dropped so many times.
I remember watching that Reid fight and thinking how good David looked and then after Tito put him on his butt his whole plan just fell apart. The reality is his career never recovered from that fight bad eye or not.
Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks