What about the Urango fight? Why did he fade so badly?Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
What about the Urango fight? Why did he fade so badly?Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
I thought this thread had something to do with Hatton ...
Pretty juvenile stuff, guys. Makes neither of you look cool. And it doesn't make for very good reading, either.
Array
Bloody chest infectionOriginally Posted by DIOS DOMINICANO
Array
That's bullshit. Hatton was 100% for the Collazo fight. He just got his ass beat. People want to point to the fact that he only had a couple of weeks to prepare for Collazo. So what? Last time I checked Collazo only had a couple weeks to prepare for Hatton.Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Array
Sorry, he chooses to do it on the main board, I sent a PM to him. I apologise. I'm just gonna ignore him, he aint got a hope anyway.Originally Posted by NuthaPug
..and it wasn't a couple of weeks.Originally Posted by Violent Demise
The May 13th date had been locked down for MONTHS. The opponent was chosen on March 22. Hatton had seven weeks of sparring knowing who he was gonna fight.
Collazo was just a young, fresh fighter for Ricky. Similarly, Urango was young & fresh. Those are the guys that trouble Ricky. Hatton does best when he can overwhelm a fighter with his energy and physicality.
VD i disagree all you have to do is watch Hatton's performance against Collazo and then watch his best performance's theres big difference Hatton had 5 weeks notice to move up to Welterweight if i remember right both men had about the sametime for training but Hatton looked terrible where as that was Collazo's best performance of his career Hatton had no headmovement and was walking into shots im not trying to make an excuse Collazo fought great fight but that was nowhere near Hatton as his best.Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Hatton never really had any trouble with Urango he won nearly every round he looked lacklusture in the later rounds but he still won easily so how can you say he had trouble ??Originally Posted by DIOS DOMINICANO
Array
Great post.Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Thanks i also noticed in the Collazo that Hatton didn't use angles when on inside like he normally does im Mayweather fan as you know but im also fair and no way was that Hatton at his best.Originally Posted by Kel
Array
If they both had 5 weeks to prepare than who's fault is that Collazo was 100% but Hatton wasn't? Going into the Collazo fight, Hatton and his team both claim to be in the best shape of his career. All of a sudden he gets his ass beat and he's less than 100%Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Like i said im not trying to make excuses but Hatton was nowhere near his best he had no headmovement and he didn't use angles on the inside i've seen a few of Collazo's fights and his fight with Hatton was by far his best performance he did also perform well in his fight with Miguel Angel Gonzalez and also against Jose Antonio Rivera when he was a late subsitute and he hardly had any time for training even less than he had for Hatton fight but he still won.Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Im not sure what went wrong in Hatton's training camp maybe it was an issue with making weight i seem to remember Hatton saying he had put on too much weight or something like that ?? but all i know is that Hatton was certainly not at his best.
Array
Blah blah blahOriginally Posted by Violent Demise
Array
Cant believe u kept taking the bait. Its pathetic.Originally Posted by Kel
Array
That's what he is. PatheticOriginally Posted by eagle
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks