Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: I am very confused about this bout: Schmeling Sharkey 1

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1753
    Cool Clicks

    Default I am very confused about this bout: Schmeling Sharkey 1

    I was watching this last night and the fight was going very well for Sharkey. He was measuring Max and tagging him. He was really outboxing Schmeling.

    In the fourth there was a low blow and the fight was stopped and Jack was DQ'd.

    Was this common practice?

    4 rounds of great boxing was erased by a blatently unintentional low blow.

    It was clear it was not ment as Jack was winning the fight.
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  2. #2
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: I am very confused about this bout: Schmeling Sharkey 1

    Schmeling didn't want no part of the rematch either the NYSAC stripped Schmeling of title i wonder why

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5023
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I am very confused about this bout: Schmeling Sharkey 1

    Quote Originally Posted by PRIDE OF BOSTON
    I was watching this last night and the fight was going very well for Sharkey. He was measuring Max and tagging him. He was really outboxing Schmeling.

    In the fourth there was a low blow and the fight was stopped and Jack was DQ'd.

    Was this common practice?

    4 rounds of great boxing was erased by a blatently unintentional low blow.

    It was clear it was not ment as Jack was winning the fight.
    It's the ref's call anytime a low blow lands it is up to the ref. to determine whether it was intentional or accidental. You also gotta keep in mind that there was no deduction of points back then. Also if Max told the ref. he can't continue the ref. again would determine to rule it a ND or NC or DQ in which he went with DQ assuming Max couldn't continue.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing