do you think history repeated itself but this one at featherweight and not flyweight. Because in my oppinion pancho was the same story but at the flyweights. What do you think?Originally Posted by Julius Marvelous Rain
mick its kinda hard putting pac in that list but im glad you did. Reason being is that I don't think we will remember pac at 126 as much as we will remember him above that weight. The first fight with mab is clearly his first rise to the top but imo pac just scrape the featherweight then never took more time to be listed as a 126'pounder. I'd favor JMM to be listed as a 125pounder cause after pac,mab,eric left it was jmm's division. Unlike how all four was once there, nobody could really claim the division for themselves. Exept mab before pac beat him he was dubbed featherweight KING. Afterwards pac was never dubbed as king though, he was dubbed as the "peoples champ" remember that mick? then pac insisted he wanted eric, but he had to fight jmm first at 126....we all know what happened there. He still got his fight with eric though but not at 126, they would have their trilogy at 130.Originally Posted by CutMeMick
I've come to my senses that in order for me to rate Pep & Saddler I need to have seen more then just 4 fights. At that I've only see 1 complete fight as the rest we're Highlights. With that being said here goes:
1. Sanchez
2. Nelson
3. Saldivar
4. Ramos
5. Alexis
6. Moore
7. Pedroza
8. JMM
9. Pacquiao
10. Hamed
I'd also like to point out that Pedroza is ALWAYS overlooked.
I said earlier that jmm is more suited in that list then pac becuase jmm does not have much fights at 130 as a matter of fact he has very little and a lot more at 126. As for pac, his career may have began to reach elite class at the featherweights but his already planning on moving to lightweights and I believe he has a lot more damage to do in that division although he reck havok at the featherweight/superfeatherweight division. So we should all stay tune
also I don't know how you can rate S.salvador at number 1, when you say you haven't gotten to see enough of sandler and pep thats why you didn't list them. In sanches case, he never even reach his prime though and only had a few fights to declare his greatness, I just want to ask if your sure sanchez is the best featherweight of all time? In that case, do you think history repeated itself but this one at featherweight and not flyweight. Because in my oppinion pancho was the same story but at the flyweights. What do you think?
Nope Jimmy Wilde is best Flyweight of all time.
Bookmarks