Re: The Ring magazine covers
I had a subscription and thought it sucked really. Not much on anyone but the very top tier, and I know what the hell they are doing anyway.
I remember I really enjoyed an Israel Vasquez interview in one of them but thats about the only they that stands out. The information is dated and the stuff that isn't dated seems like one big fucking commercial about some big upcoming fight.
As if one big fight is all we give a shit about.
I also think the rankings are biased and pretty much a popularity contest. Not to say they don't have the best belt, but look who you are comparing them too!
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
Bookmarks