Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: The Sport of Boxing

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    341
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    979
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Sport of Boxing

    Instant replay to decide if a cut is from a punch or from a headbutt. It can also work for reviewing of low blows. whether a fighter deserves the 5 minute break.

    Weigh-ins done in the same day so fighters would be fighting in their natural weight. No more excessive ballooning. No more weight issues. This could very well mean an upward adjustment of weight limits (in the UFC, the lightweight division limit is 155 lbs).

    1 point must system. a deduction of 1 point to a fighter who gets KD. or an additional of 1 point to the fighter who scored the KD. works the same way with the 10 point must system. but is obviously a lot more simple. making the
    scorecards more comprehensible. It should also make bullshit scorings more noticeable.

    I am skeptical with this, I'm not so sure but I think one of the judges scorecard should be announced after the 11th round. thus making a hint to a fighter if he needs a KO to win.This could lead to a more exciting fight.

    I'm pretty sure in this one, ban Joe Cortez forever. Boxing would thrive.
    An empty can is always noisy.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1003
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Sport of Boxing

    Totally agree with the cheaper fights. Like, I would love to watch Hatton vs Pacquiao. But am I going to pay $50? No, only if Floyd Mayweather came outta retirement to fight Mosley . Put it down to $15-20 I would pay that for sure. And I'm sure more people would.

    Also, advertise. Commercials, buildups shown to the public. I don't know when a fight is about to happen unless I am keeping a close eye on boxing. The public needs to know. I am sure lots of people not even that interested would pay 15 bucks to watch Hatton and Pacquiao especially if there were good exciting commercials building up these fights.

    About the judges, assume this:
    Boxer A is a flurry-thrower, but they are light slaps.
    Boxer B is a hard-hitter that throws less often but when they are thrown they do damage

    Good Judge: scores the round for Boxer B b/c he is doing the damage
    Computer: it senses more punches for Boxer A yet Boxer A is getting his head dented in by only a few punches!
    Average Judge: Who know?

    Also many are worried that computer-judged fights will become like fencing matches. I don't think computer-monitered fights would work.

    I think that the idea about more money if KO would make boxing WAY more interesting. Assume I am Hatton and gettin 40% of the profit. If I do my best to KO Pacquiao and succeed I get, say 50% (unrealistically large probably). Then fighters would step in the ring thinking, "I gotta KO this guy to make more money" not "I am going to jab all night long as the people sleep"

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Sport of Boxing

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky Balboa View Post
    Totally agree with the cheaper fights. Like, I would love to watch Hatton vs Pacquiao. But am I going to pay $50? No, only if Floyd Mayweather came outta retirement to fight Mosley . Put it down to $15-20 I would pay that for sure. And I'm sure more people would.

    Also, advertise. Commercials, buildups shown to the public. I don't know when a fight is about to happen unless I am keeping a close eye on boxing. The public needs to know. I am sure lots of people not even that interested would pay 15 bucks to watch Hatton and Pacquiao especially if there were good exciting commercials building up these fights.

    About the judges, assume this:
    Boxer A is a flurry-thrower, but they are light slaps.
    Boxer B is a hard-hitter that throws less often but when they are thrown they do damage

    Good Judge: scores the round for Boxer B b/c he is doing the damage
    Computer: it senses more punches for Boxer A yet Boxer A is getting his head dented in by only a few punches!
    Average Judge: Who know?

    Also many are worried that computer-judged fights will become like fencing matches. I don't think computer-monitered fights would work.

    I think that the idea about more money if KO would make boxing WAY more interesting. Assume I am Hatton and gettin 40% of the profit. If I do my best to KO Pacquiao and succeed I get, say 50% (unrealistically large probably). Then fighters would step in the ring thinking, "I gotta KO this guy to make more money" not "I am going to jab all night long as the people sleep"
    That's what it costs over here for a PPV fights, can't believe over there you have to pay that kind of ridiculous money for a fight. If it was even £30 for a fight I wouldn't pay it.

    Agree with most of that apart from the KO bit, which I think would be almost impossible to bring into play. The boxer should be focused on winning not on the KO IMO and I think it could mean too many boxers gassing out trying to KO the other guy

  4. #19
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    575
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    952
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Sport of Boxing

    If I could change one thing it would be the duration between each top fighter's fight... having to wait 5-6 months between each boxer's big money fights is ridiculous. I understand why it's done but it could be done alot differently, even if it was cut down to 2-3 months would be okay for me, the suspense for the Hatton - Pac Man fight has been killing me, and there's still 3 full months to go...

    I think the WWE is a great example. They are able to air a PPV once a month and generate big income. Sure, it's all scripted and no one is generally hurt in the process, but the fact that they can advertise these fights and sell out stadiums in a month alone shows boxing can be done differently in this respect.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Sport of Boxing

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeyUK View Post
    If I could change one thing it would be the duration between each top fighter's fight... having to wait 5-6 months between each boxer's big money fights is ridiculous. I understand why it's done but it could be done alot differently, even if it was cut down to 2-3 months would be okay for me, the suspense for the Hatton - Pac Man fight has been killing me, and there's still 3 full months to go...

    I think the WWE is a great example. They are able to air a PPV once a month and generate big income. Sure, it's all scripted and no one is generally hurt in the process, but the fact that they can advertise these fights and sell out stadiums in a month alone shows boxing can be done differently in this respect.
    This doesn't take into account the fact that a top boxer needs prep time for each fight. If it was every 2-3 months that would mean that a boxer would basically finish a fight & already have to get ready for his next fight, something these guys who do it, have earned the right not to do. IMO 4-6 months is more than fair.

  6. #21
    jon09 Guest

    Smile Re: The Sport of Boxing

    Well the prices on ppvs being cheaper which was mentioned earlier is a good start, but also the quality of the undercards would help I get tired of seeing poor quality undercards for a good main event for 50 bucks. Plus I do not understand why you would see a Lightweight main event and they showcase middleweights and straw weights on the same card. Why not showcase the divisions best to set up for the next big fight. Basically what I am getting at is marketing fighters and promotions better would be a good start to improving boxing.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1003
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Sport of Boxing

    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    Agree with most of that apart from the KO bit, which I think would be almost impossible to bring into play. The boxer should be focused on winning not on the KO IMO and I think it could mean too many boxers gassing out trying to KO the other guy
    that's true

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. What about the sport of boxing makes you a fan?
    By DaxxKahn in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 11-27-2008, 03:57 PM
  2. Two-Sport Boxing Stars
    By Testudo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-18-2008, 02:46 PM
  3. In the sport of boxing
    By Ghost in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 10-16-2008, 10:03 PM
  4. How popular is the sport of Boxing?
    By Hulk in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 07-21-2005, 10:18 PM
  5. Is boxing your only sport?
    By Sharker25 in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-07-2005, 06:57 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing