Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

View Poll Results: Who wins this fight?

Voters
43. This poll is closed
  • Manny Pacquiao

    16 37.21%
  • Shane Mosley

    27 62.79%
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 60

Thread: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,048
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Just to clarify, this is a welterweight title fight at a lower catchweight

    huh, well the just proves that even if PAC wins the "welterweight" title, he has no intention of keeping it. Unless maybe he fights a few lower tier fighters at 147.

    Delusions of grandeur for PAC it sounds like.
    Yeah,its getting pretty obnoxious.Frankly...Mosleys a dope if he drops below 147....Pac should have to make the weight to stake the claim.These name affairs are ever increasing.I do think it will be a nice fight,but Mosley should compromise nothing in his existing advantages.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2547
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    Why does Pacquaio have to move up?

    Mosley was the one who really got this ball rolling after all. He wants it.

    You could just as easily say Mosley was picking on a smaller guy but that goes against the grain around here these days. I've got nothing but respect for Mosley but the criticism of Pac around here is hilarious. A year ago or so he was fighting at 130 ffs.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    why do these guys who claim to know boxing, moaning about the welterweight title.

    The title can be up for grabs between the weights of 141 - 147. If the champion agree he'll fight at a catchweight between those pounds, then the title will be on the line.

    Shane usually weigh ins right on the dot of 147, he himself believe a few pounds wouldn't be a problem. I think its 2 pounds less at 145 were they agreed on. If I remember correctly pac weighed in 142 for oscar, his only fight at 147 and shane has fought above welterweights. I would rather have the fight at 147 without catchweight cause I know some of these anti pac will discredit the win cause they dont understand the rules for boxing titles.

    I think the catchweight is fair because pac hasn't settled in at any weight class above 130. he fought once at each of the three he came up to. Shane has been in with much bigger fighters then pac and shane has ko'ed those guys. Shane being Shane he knows that it would be fair to agree on a catchweight.

    I think these guys just dont want pac at a shot of his 7th division title especially not the one shane is holding cuase that would be pacs 5th lineal title. Plus these guys have openly admitted misfortune wishes opon thee pacman, sad adults really

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    Rain quick question i still dont get how he had a lineal title at 112 because the ring is the one to keep track of it and they dont have him there. Its like saying that Leonard was a lineal titlest at 168 becasue there none listed at the time enless you have some source i am missing or somthing.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    284
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    I see this fight going alot like Cotto vs Mosley accept more one sided. Cotto landed the crisper shots of the two and Pacquiao has quicker hands than Cotto. I dont see a knockout for either of them, but Pacquiao landing the cleaner and more volume of shots. If the little bit of weight loss doesn't effect Mosley for the worse than this will be a heck of a night! Like Freddie Roach said, when Pacquiao and Mosley step in the ring they come to fight, not just to win!

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    Doesn't look like this fight is that certain to happen

    Roach: 'Mosley not on my radar'

    I think Roach doesn't represent himself well at the end when he trys to compare the Oscar of 2000-2002 with the one Pacquiao beat. Shame as having met Roach I genuinely like the guy.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2582
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    Doesn't look like this fight is that certain to happen

    Roach: 'Mosley not on my radar'

    I think Roach doesn't represent himself well at the end when he trys to compare the Oscar of 2000-2002 with the one Pacquiao beat. Shame as having met Roach I genuinely like the guy.
    damn thats messed up. i bet anything that if Cotto wins next saturday Cotto will fight Pac if anything.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    Doesn't look like this fight is that certain to happen

    Roach: 'Mosley not on my radar'

    I think Roach doesn't represent himself well at the end when he trys to compare the Oscar of 2000-2002 with the one Pacquiao beat. Shame as having met Roach I genuinely like the guy.
    Don't look that way. The biitch in Pac and Roach is coming out

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    Mosley!!!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    Doesn't look like this fight is that certain to happen

    Roach: 'Mosley not on my radar'

    I think Roach doesn't represent himself well at the end when he trys to compare the Oscar of 2000-2002 with the one Pacquiao beat. Shame as having met Roach I genuinely like the guy.
    Don't look that way. The biitch in Pac and Roach is coming out
    That article is lazy Journalism hearsay and the author puts in his disclaimer at the start.

    "The conversation wasn’t complicated, Roach said. It went something like this:"

    That Mosley visit to the wild card was Mosley's first approach to Roach on his campaign to land a fight with Pacquiao.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Charlottetown, Canada
    Posts
    2,292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2607
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    I don't care what anyone says. From what I have seen of Mosley, he is old.

    He looked good against Margarito because Margarito is there to be hit and easy to pull the trigger against. Mosley looked better than he really is in that fight. Take one step back to the mayorga fight and then you will see Mosley.

    Manny beats him by a wide unanimous decision and it will only be a bit more competitive than the ODLH fight.

  12. #42
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    why do these guys who claim to know boxing, moaning about the welterweight title.

    The title can be up for grabs between the weights of 141 - 147. If the champion agree he'll fight at a catchweight between those pounds, then the title will be on the line.

    Shane usually weigh ins right on the dot of 147, he himself believe a few pounds wouldn't be a problem. I think its 2 pounds less at 145 were they agreed on. If I remember correctly pac weighed in 142 for oscar, his only fight at 147 and shane has fought above welterweights. I would rather have the fight at 147 without catchweight cause I know some of these anti pac will discredit the win cause they dont understand the rules for boxing titles.

    I think the catchweight is fair because pac hasn't settled in at any weight class above 130. he fought once at each of the three he came up to. Shane has been in with much bigger fighters then pac and shane has ko'ed those guys. Shane being Shane he knows that it would be fair to agree on a catchweight.

    I think these guys just dont want pac at a shot of his 7th division title especially not the one shane is holding cuase that would be pacs 5th lineal title. Plus these guys have openly admitted misfortune wishes opon thee pacman, sad adults really
    Well said Julius...
    .

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,244
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1394
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    yeah, that would give the pachuggers something more to crow about and we certainly don't want to see that. lol

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    355
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    913
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    This is a very tricky fight and I could only hope that Mosley comes in shape and not loses to much muscle or water.
    Those couple of punds could really hurt him, but he has Nazim and Hopkins in his corner.
    He says he is always in shape, and constantly training, so he is not a part time fighter like De La Hoya.
    Depending on how much Pacquiao moves and his pressure, or Mosley's, I am favoring Shane at this moment.
    But I can't predict the future or the boxers' gameplans.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,574
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1503
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao VS Shane Mosley

    Pacquaio simply said he's willing to fight Mosley. He also said that it's up to his promoter. So there is no assurance yet that this fight will happen. However, in case it does, this will be a very difficult fight for Pac but his speed and POWER will prevail on this.

    People are saying that Mosley is sort of an idiot if he fights below 147 but they don't see it that PAcquaio would be a complete moron if he fights at 147.

    Pac haters are here again claiming to be knowledgeable in boxing.

    Generally speaking, a fighter that goes up in weight is clearly put at a disadvantage. What Pacquaio is doing is simply trying to make the game fair by fighting at a catchweight coz he is simply at a disadvantaged position. Remember guys, Pac was at 130 lbs last year and you're hoping that he goes up to 147 to be massacred there and you CALL yourself boxing fans? Let's be real boxing fans here and you will accept that Mosley and Pac fighting at a catchweight is but fair.

    Ohhhh, you're now afraid that what happened to DLH may happen to Mosley coz most of you, haters, predicted that PAc will go down easily against DLH but you were proven deadly wrong. So you're claiming now that DLH was weight drained. HAve you forgotten that weeks before the fight, DLH was already weighing somewhere at 147. I don't see any real weight drained DLH there. What we saw was PAcquaio overwhelming de la hoya with his speed and POWER. Diaz admitted after the fight that PAc was too fast, HAtton didn't believe it so he went down easily. Now let me remind you again, Pac's arsenal is not only his speed. Never underestimate his POWER.

    PLease..... as Oumafan had stated, let's stop the hating.You're all becoming like VD here.

    Don't get me wrong but before I became a Pacquaio fan, I'm the biggest Mosley fan in real life. You can actually call me a Mosley nuthugger and I won't mind.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Shane Mosley vs Manny Pacquiao
    By Majesty in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 03-19-2009, 08:37 AM
  2. Manny VS Shane, Hatton, Mayweather, and Cotto
    By Onix in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-07-2008, 09:52 PM
  3. Should Shane Mosley be P4P top 10 once again?
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 02-12-2007, 07:48 PM
  4. Shane Mosley
    By hardrock in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-11-2006, 04:22 PM
  5. shane mosley
    By TICH in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-08-2006, 02:20 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing