Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1216
    Cool Clicks

    Default Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    I know many people here doesnt want this kind of thread but this is a simple fact that is being ignored.

    After Pac beat Dela Hoya in 2008 ( 1st fight at 147 ) here is the RING Welterweight Ranking

    1. Antonio Margarito
    2. Miguel Angel Cotto
    3. Shane Mosley
    4. Joshua Clottey
    5. Manny Pacquiao
    6. Carlos Quintana
    7. Zab Judah
    8. Luis Collazo
    9. Andre Berto
    10. Isaac Hlatshwayo

    The Ring Magazine's Annual Ratings: Welterweight--2000s - Boxrec Boxing Encyclopaedia


    Now almost 3 yrs later. Pac's competition as of late are not really good? and all these guys are at least 10-15lbs heavier.
    Last edited by miron_lang; 03-17-2011 at 10:55 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    You have to take a look of when the fights took place. The Cotto fight was a good one, and he should have followed it up with Mosley after the fallout with Floyd but instead went with Clottey whom no one really gave a shot of beating him. Margarito hasn't had a significant win since July of '08 when he fought Cotto and looked like crap in his 1 comeback fight before fighting Pac.

    Again the timing itself has to be questioned. If he was fighting Shane Mosley last year around this time it would be called a good fight. But now after Floyd and Mora? Shane looks like a shot fighter.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1216
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    You have to take a look of when the fights took place. The Cotto fight was a good one, and he should have followed it up with Mosley after the fallout with Floyd but instead went with Clottey whom no one really gave a shot of beating him. Margarito hasn't had a significant win since July of '08 when he fought Cotto and looked like crap in his 1 comeback fight before fighting Pac.

    Again the timing itself has to be questioned. If he was fighting Shane Mosley last year around this time it would be called a good fight. But now after Floyd and Mora? Shane looks like a shot fighter.

    After Mosley comes Clottey in the ranking. yeah the timing can be questioned but as he enters the division the TOP 4 were the fighters he have fought.

    Those TOP 4 Welters fought each other ( Cotto, Margarito, Mosley ) We can also add Clottey who fought Marg and Cotto. Do we ask those fighters to wait for Pacquiao so that we are sure that these fighters are not coming off losses?

    Mosley won againts Mora a style he doesnt look good againts. he lost to Mayweather who is regarded as the best fighter around by many people. Those 2 fights tells us that Mosley is shot following the sensational KO victory over the other major player in these drama in Margarito?

    Lets fair him with Berto.... I think your conscience will tell you how Mosley might perform against Berto.

    ----

    Clottey lost to Cotto and Margarito
    Cotto lost to Margarito
    Mosley lost to Cotto
    Margarito lost to Mosley


    These are the 4 best fighters when Pac entered the WELTERWEIGHT DIVISION and PAC FOUGHT THEM ALL.( Will fight Mosley) them coming of bad performances are idiots excuses because they lost to each other. They didnt lose to any GateKeepers or other contenders like Judah, Cintron, Collazo or Quintana. THey lost to their fellow ranked welters.

    And Pac is giving away at least 10-15lbs against them on every fight.

    Mosley is done because he lost to FLoyd? I thought Floyd is the best fighter around? he's supposed to lose to Floyd
    Last edited by miron_lang; 03-17-2011 at 10:31 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    anyone can pick holes in anyones record

    on this forum virtually all the top performers of this generation and dating back to ali and further have been rubbished

    pac has an amazing record and deserves to be called the best (or in the top 2 at least) and will deserve to go down in history as one of the best ever

    if pac had fought mosley after cotto then everyone would be saying mosley was shot coz of the mayorga fight

    clotty was a tough man who had given all the welterweights problems and pac is tiny in comparison

    since he started moving up through the weights he has fought the best around
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Not in the Neutral Corner
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    830
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    You have to take a look of when the fights took place. The Cotto fight was a good one, and he should have followed it up with Mosley after the fallout with Floyd but instead went with Clottey whom no one really gave a shot of beating him. Margarito hasn't had a significant win since July of '08 when he fought Cotto and looked like crap in his 1 comeback fight before fighting Pac.

    Again the timing itself has to be questioned. If he was fighting Shane Mosley last year around this time it would be called a good fight. But now after Floyd and Mora? Shane looks like a shot fighter.
    After the collapse of the first Pacquiao-Mayweather negotiation, Manny could not fight Mosley since Shane was already scheduled to fight Berto. That fight was cancelled because of the earthquake in Haiti but by that time the contract had already been signed for the Pacquiao-Clottey fight. There was no other viable opponent available then. Even JMM and Bradley had fights scheduled.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by miron_lang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    You have to take a look of when the fights took place. The Cotto fight was a good one, and he should have followed it up with Mosley after the fallout with Floyd but instead went with Clottey whom no one really gave a shot of beating him. Margarito hasn't had a significant win since July of '08 when he fought Cotto and looked like crap in his 1 comeback fight before fighting Pac.

    Again the timing itself has to be questioned. If he was fighting Shane Mosley last year around this time it would be called a good fight. But now after Floyd and Mora? Shane looks like a shot fighter.

    After Mosley comes Clottey in the ranking. yeah the timing can be questioned but as he enters the division the TOP 4 were the fighters he have fought.

    Those TOP 4 Welters fought each other ( Cotto, Margarito, Mosley ) We can also add Clottey who fought Marg and Cotto. Do we ask those fighters to wait for Pacquiao so that we are sure that these fighters are not coming off losses?

    Mosley won againts Mora a style he doesnt look good againts. he lost to Mayweather who is regarded as the best fighter around by many people. Those 2 fights tells us that Mosley is shot following the sensational KO victory over the other major player in these drama in Margarito?

    Lets fair him with Berto.... I think your conscience will tell you how Mosley might perform against Berto.

    ----

    Clottey lost to Cotto and Margarito
    Cotto lost to Margarito
    Mosley lost to Cotto
    Margarito lost to Mosley


    These are the 4 best fighters when Pac entered the WELTERWEIGHT DIVISION and PAC FOUGHT THEM ALL.( Will fight Mosley) them coming of bad performances are idiots excuses because they lost to each other. They didnt lose to any GateKeepers or other contenders like Judah, Cintron, Collazo or Quintana. THey lost to their fellow ranked welters.

    And Pac is giving away at least 10-15lbs against them on every fight.

    Mosley is done because he lost to FLoyd? I thought Floyd is the best fighter around? he's supposed to lose to Floyd
    Mosley is done because he looked like shit against a reality tv boxer in Mora. A feather fisted one at that. Mosley 3 or 4 years ago would have handle him with ease. Mosley is a severely declining fighter this is generally accepted by most boxing fans. What are you telling me that Mosley is still prime or just slightly past prime? If he is't shot, he's close to it.

    So now Pac fights Mosley, when he didn't want none of it when Mosley just ko Margarito. You know the same Mosley that says he's willing to go down all the way to 140 when Roach proposed a catchweight of 142 or 143. After the Mayweather fight fell through last year, the Pac team should have made a fight with Mosley, but Floyd got there first. Now that Mosley looked shot against a reality tv feather fisted boxer, it's the right time to pick Mosley right?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    And speaking of tiny, Floyd ain't no natural welterweight either. And for Floyd's career he usually hydrates 1 to 2 pounds on fight night. Many times in Floyd's career where he was outweigh by 10-15 pounds. Like the Corrales fight, Oscar fight, etc.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1783
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    I swear some of you guys should get a Bachelors degree in Pac and Floyd Boxing History. I'm working on my master in Floyds opposition. With a BA in Pac's anatomy.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    And speaking of tiny, Floyd ain't no natural welterweight either. And for Floyd's career he usually hydrates 1 to 2 pounds on fight night. Many times in Floyd's career where he was outweigh by 10-15 pounds. Like the Corrales fight, Oscar fight, etc.
    True but Floyd doesn't beat up his opponent like the way pac beats them up.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1181
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    And speaking of tiny, Floyd ain't no natural welterweight either. And for Floyd's career he usually hydrates 1 to 2 pounds on fight night. Many times in Floyd's career where he was outweigh by 10-15 pounds. Like the Corrales fight, Oscar fight, etc.
    True but Floyd doesn't beat up his opponent like the way pac beats them up.
    nailed it
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1181
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    And speaking of tiny, Floyd ain't no natural welterweight either. And for Floyd's career he usually hydrates 1 to 2 pounds on fight night. Many times in Floyd's career where he was outweigh by 10-15 pounds. Like the Corrales fight, Oscar fight, etc.
    I just hope one of these days HBO would at least show PBF's actual fight night weight. The recent one's at least.
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1181
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    The PAC vs Floyd debate as how I see it. It is like a English Spelling bee PBF being the American who speaks his native tongue who's excellent at it but is expected to do so, and PAC is your ESL who does excellent as well but is considered more impressive because it is not his native tongue.
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    The PAC vs Floyd debate as how I see it. It is like a English Spelling bee PBF being the American who speaks his native tongue who's excellent at it but is expected to do so, and PAC is your ESL who does excellent as well but is considered more impressive because it is not his native tongue.

    im not sure what you mean
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1401
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    The PAC vs Floyd debate as how I see it. It is like a English Spelling bee PBF being the American who speaks his native tongue who's excellent at it but is expected to do so, and PAC is your ESL who does excellent as well but is considered more impressive because it is not his native tongue.

    im not sure what you mean
    Basically i think he means Mayweather is more naturally talented, but Pacquiao looks more impressive because he's reached a similar level without having the same natural gifts.

    Of course, it's bollocks

    Mayweather does have the more natural technical ability and he does have a naturally higher skill set. But Boxing is so much more than that.
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac's recent opponet is really that bad?

    I'm not so sure. Mayweather has a better defensive skill set, but Pac has the superior offensive skill set. I think they both excel in quite different ways. That is one of the reasons we all want to see them in the ring.

    As for the level of opposition I don't think anyone has said that Pac's opposition is bad, but there have been issues with when the opponents have been selected. For instance Mosley....why now? He hasn't earned a shot and has looked poor recently. That in turn reflects very badly on Manny.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Pac's new sparmate?
    By :::PSL::: in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-12-2010, 09:56 PM
  2. Pac's Questions
    By fan johnny in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-09-2009, 06:06 AM
  3. Nov 14 might be PAC's last fight
    By Pavlik in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-03-2009, 12:46 AM
  4. Who will be Pavlik's next opponet.
    By southakron314 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-24-2008, 02:43 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-09-2007, 05:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing