Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: Khan could have signed for ITV.

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    Quote Originally Posted by ryanman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I think people are too quick to blame Amir for everything.

    It was Sky who backed out of the PPV in what I believe to be an unprecedented decision and he and his team decided that they weren't happy with Sky's behaviour and chose to go to Primetime instead.

    He's lost money as a result so I guess it was a principled decision on his part.

    I think the terrestial companies in the UK are shit for boxing generally repeatedly snubbing fighters, most notable Carl Froch.

    The best scenario would be if the Primetime card does better than expected and they start to establish themselves as a genuine alternative.

    Fuck Sky and their costly subscription services. Anything that would break the stranglehold of Rupert Murdoch's empire would be very welcome.
    I like Murdoch and admire him , his Sky subscription is reasonable in my opinion , £65 per month for HD. Whats expensive about that ?
    haha that made me lol.

    Only heavy hitters like Preme and his national average wage or myself on taxpayers fundings could afford such an extravagance.
    Times are changing , the tide is turning , the revolution is going to happen , and if you do nothing you will get nothing, and you will also get no pity.
    He will get pity from me. I'm happy to pay my taxes to help the less fortunate, and so are lots of other people. So there will be no revolution -or if there is it won't be of the type you expect.
    Can I plump your cushion Bilbo?
    Well if you and your do gooder friends want to pay a bit more , then I dont have to give anything , then its fine by me.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I think people are too quick to blame Amir for everything.

    It was Sky who backed out of the PPV in what I believe to be an unprecedented decision and he and his team decided that they weren't happy with Sky's behaviour and chose to go to Primetime instead.

    He's lost money as a result so I guess it was a principled decision on his part.

    I think the terrestial companies in the UK are shit for boxing generally repeatedly snubbing fighters, most notable Carl Froch.

    The best scenario would be if the Primetime card does better than expected and they start to establish themselves as a genuine alternative.

    Fuck Sky and their costly subscription services. Anything that would break the stranglehold of Rupert Murdoch's empire would be very welcome.
    I like Murdoch and admire him , his Sky subscription is reasonable in my opinion , £65 per month for HD. Whats expensive about that ?
    haha that made me lol.

    Only heavy hitters like Preme and his national average wage or myself on taxpayers fundings could afford such an extravagance.
    Times are changing , the tide is turning , the revolution is going to happen , and if you do nothing you will get nothing, and you will also get no pity.
    He will get pity from me. I'm happy to pay my taxes to help the less fortunate, and so are lots of other people. So there will be no revolution -or if there is it won't be of the type you expect.
    Can I plump your cushion Bilbo?
    Well if you and your do gooder friends want to pay a bit more , then I dont have to give anything , then its fine by me.
    Actually I'm very much looking forward to the reforms myself.

    I know people on here have assumed that I don't work because I don't want to but that's actually not the case.

    I have taken part time work before but was told to stop it because it would invalidate my health status.

    Currently I am declared permanently unfit for work due to extensive lung damage. This isn't like a bad back that I can fake it's literally that I have pulmonary fibrosis of the lungs, a permanent and progressive condition that once started gives an average life expectancy of five years. You should google it.

    Anyway the problem for me is that in taking part time work I automatically get put onto a three month back to work trial where after three months of working part time I would get an interview to see whether I could go into full time work.

    Because of the effects of lung disease on the whole body I could never support myself full time as I wouldn't be fit enough to work the 40 hours needed to be fully financially independent.

    Hence why I was told by the benefits office not to take the job. I had accepted a 16 hour a week car delivery job. The manager of the car firm was prepared to accomodate my needs and allow me to work 16 hours, and I wanted to do it, but unfortunately the system isn't particularly well set up at present and penalises those who do want to try and work.

    Under the new legislation I will hopefully be supported and encouraged to work without the pressure of losing benefits if I take a job.

    To automatically assume that everyone sick is trying to cheat their way out of having to do anything is very desparaging of a lot of people. Clearly it is the case for some, but a lot of people in this world genuinely have had serious illnesses and are suffering as a result.

    My own battle with cancer was as serious as it gets. I was given six months to live in 2000 and told that my disease was probably terminal as my lung damage was too severe to continue treatment and I had spent 6 weeks in isolation with pneumonia and septeciama.

    I am very self deprecating by nature and don't always present myself in the best light but physically I have been through more than you can imagine and will hopefully ever have to endure.

    It is pretty wretched and unfair what happened to me and it's not like this is the life I would have chosen for myself but we are dealt the cards of life and must cope as best we can.

    Anyway this is too serious a posting for me so I am going back to annoying Miles..

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    dartford kent
    Posts
    378
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    975
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I think people are too quick to blame Amir for everything.

    It was Sky who backed out of the PPV in what I believe to be an unprecedented decision and he and his team decided that they weren't happy with Sky's behaviour and chose to go to Primetime instead.

    He's lost money as a result so I guess it was a principled decision on his part.

    I think the terrestial companies in the UK are shit for boxing generally repeatedly snubbing fighters, most notable Carl Froch.

    The best scenario would be if the Primetime card does better than expected and they start to establish themselves as a genuine alternative.

    Fuck Sky and their costly subscription services. Anything that would break the stranglehold of Rupert Murdoch's empire would be very welcome.
    I like Murdoch and admire him , his Sky subscription is reasonable in my opinion , £65 per month for HD. Whats expensive about that ?
    haha that made me lol.

    Only heavy hitters like Preme and his national average wage or myself on taxpayers fundings could afford such an extravagance.
    Times are changing , the tide is turning , the revolution is going to happen , and if you do nothing you will get nothing, and you will also get no pity.
    He will get pity from me. I'm happy to pay my taxes to help the less fortunate, and so are lots of other people. So there will be no revolution -or if there is it won't be of the type you expect.
    Can I plump your cushion Bilbo?
    Well if you and your do gooder friends want to pay a bit more , then I dont have to give anything , then its fine by me.
    Actually I'm very much looking forward to the reforms myself.

    I know people on here have assumed that I don't work because I don't want to but that's actually not the case.

    I have taken part time work before but was told to stop it because it would invalidate my health status.

    Currently I am declared permanently unfit for work due to extensive lung damage. This isn't like a bad back that I can fake it's literally that I have pulmonary fibrosis of the lungs, a permanent and progressive condition that once started gives an average life expectancy of five years. You should google it.

    Anyway the problem for me is that in taking part time work I automatically get put onto a three month back to work trial where after three months of working part time I would get an interview to see whether I could go into full time work.

    Because of the effects of lung disease on the whole body I could never support myself full time as I wouldn't be fit enough to work the 40 hours needed to be fully financially independent.

    Hence why I was told by the benefits office not to take the job. I had accepted a 16 hour a week car delivery job. The manager of the car firm was prepared to accomodate my needs and allow me to work 16 hours, and I wanted to do it, but unfortunately the system isn't particularly well set up at present and penalises those who do want to try and work.

    Under the new legislation I will hopefully be supported and encouraged to work without the pressure of losing benefits if I take a job.

    To automatically assume that everyone sick is trying to cheat their way out of having to do anything is very desparaging of a lot of people. Clearly it is the case for some, but a lot of people in this world genuinely have had serious illnesses and are suffering as a result.

    My own battle with cancer was as serious as it gets. I was given six months to live in 2000 and told that my disease was probably terminal as my lung damage was too severe to continue treatment and I had spent 6 weeks in isolation with pneumonia and septeciama.

    I am very self deprecating by nature and don't always present myself in the best light but physically I have been through more than you can imagine and will hopefully ever have to endure.

    It is pretty wretched and unfair what happened to me and it's not like this is the life I would have chosen for myself but we are dealt the cards of life and must cope as best we can.

    Anyway this is too serious a posting for me so I am going back to annoying Miles..
    Fair play your welcome to my tax, £90 to fill me motor plenty there for you mate.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    £65= $98.11

    Holy shit that's how much you Brits pay for that? I just signed up last month for the Time Warner package for $150 and that's for the entire year. I get 200 channels, including HBO and Showtime not to mentioned high speed internet access. So it's $13.33 for me monthly.

    So you guys are paying £780 or $1177 yearly? Is it a package deal that comes with like hundreds of channels and high speed internet or just Sky only? That's really expensive to say to say the least.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    5,351
    Mentioned
    116 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1197
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I think people are too quick to blame Amir for everything.

    It was Sky who backed out of the PPV in what I believe to be an unprecedented decision and he and his team decided that they weren't happy with Sky's behaviour and chose to go to Primetime instead.

    He's lost money as a result so I guess it was a principled decision on his part.

    I think the terrestial companies in the UK are shit for boxing generally repeatedly snubbing fighters, most notable Carl Froch.

    The best scenario would be if the Primetime card does better than expected and they start to establish themselves as a genuine alternative.

    Fuck Sky and their costly subscription services. Anything that would break the stranglehold of Rupert Murdoch's empire would be very welcome.
    I like Murdoch and admire him , his Sky subscription is reasonable in my opinion , £65 per month for HD. Whats expensive about that ?
    haha that made me lol.

    Only heavy hitters like Preme and his national average wage or myself on taxpayers fundings could afford such an extravagance.
    Times are changing , the tide is turning , the revolution is going to happen , and if you do nothing you will get nothing, and you will also get no pity.
    He will get pity from me. I'm happy to pay my taxes to help the less fortunate, and so are lots of other people. So there will be no revolution -or if there is it won't be of the type you expect.
    Can I plump your cushion Bilbo?
    Well if you and your do gooder friends want to pay a bit more , then I dont have to give anything , then its fine by me.
    Actually I'm very much looking forward to the reforms myself.

    I know people on here have assumed that I don't work because I don't want to but that's actually not the case.

    I have taken part time work before but was told to stop it because it would invalidate my health status.

    Currently I am declared permanently unfit for work due to extensive lung damage. This isn't like a bad back that I can fake it's literally that I have pulmonary fibrosis of the lungs, a permanent and progressive condition that once started gives an average life expectancy of five years. You should google it.

    Anyway the problem for me is that in taking part time work I automatically get put onto a three month back to work trial where after three months of working part time I would get an interview to see whether I could go into full time work.

    Because of the effects of lung disease on the whole body I could never support myself full time as I wouldn't be fit enough to work the 40 hours needed to be fully financially independent.

    Hence why I was told by the benefits office not to take the job. I had accepted a 16 hour a week car delivery job. The manager of the car firm was prepared to accomodate my needs and allow me to work 16 hours, and I wanted to do it, but unfortunately the system isn't particularly well set up at present and penalises those who do want to try and work.

    Under the new legislation I will hopefully be supported and encouraged to work without the pressure of losing benefits if I take a job.

    To automatically assume that everyone sick is trying to cheat their way out of having to do anything is very desparaging of a lot of people. Clearly it is the case for some, but a lot of people in this world genuinely have had serious illnesses and are suffering as a result.

    My own battle with cancer was as serious as it gets. I was given six months to live in 2000 and told that my disease was probably terminal as my lung damage was too severe to continue treatment and I had spent 6 weeks in isolation with pneumonia and septeciama.

    I am very self deprecating by nature and don't always present myself in the best light but physically I have been through more than you can imagine and will hopefully ever have to endure.

    It is pretty wretched and unfair what happened to me and it's not like this is the life I would have chosen for myself but we are dealt the cards of life and must cope as best we can.

    Anyway this is too serious a posting for me so I am going back to annoying Miles..
    Bilbo,

    I didn't realise you had been through/are going through all that. I feel for you mate.

    Also, I hope you realise my message was genuine and not sarcastic. I get really annoyed with people that presume that everyone on benefits are frauds/layabouts - its just not the case. And i am genuinely happy to pay taxes to help people that need it (especially when those people would do the exact same if they had the chance).

    I totally agree with you though about the current system penalising people on benefits that seek to work. There are flaws in the system that can lead to people being worse off working say 16-25 hours a week than not working at all (In some cases). I just hope that the changes do not negatively effect those that don't deserve it - but I fear they will. But thats for another time and place I suppose.
    Saddo Fantasy Premier League
    2011/12 - 2nd
    2012/13 -1st Hidden Content
    2013/14 - 3rd (Master won)

    Saddo World Cup Dream Team
    2014 - 1st Hidden Content

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    5,351
    Mentioned
    116 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1197
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I think people are too quick to blame Amir for everything.

    It was Sky who backed out of the PPV in what I believe to be an unprecedented decision and he and his team decided that they weren't happy with Sky's behaviour and chose to go to Primetime instead.

    He's lost money as a result so I guess it was a principled decision on his part.

    I think the terrestial companies in the UK are shit for boxing generally repeatedly snubbing fighters, most notable Carl Froch.

    The best scenario would be if the Primetime card does better than expected and they start to establish themselves as a genuine alternative.

    Fuck Sky and their costly subscription services. Anything that would break the stranglehold of Rupert Murdoch's empire would be very welcome.
    I like Murdoch and admire him , his Sky subscription is reasonable in my opinion , £65 per month for HD. Whats expensive about that ?
    haha that made me lol.

    Only heavy hitters like Preme and his national average wage or myself on taxpayers fundings could afford such an extravagance.
    Times are changing , the tide is turning , the revolution is going to happen , and if you do nothing you will get nothing, and you will also get no pity.
    He will get pity from me. I'm happy to pay my taxes to help the less fortunate, and so are lots of other people. So there will be no revolution -or if there is it won't be of the type you expect.
    Can I plump your cushion Bilbo?
    Well if you and your do gooder friends want to pay a bit more , then I dont have to give anything , then its fine by me.
    Maybe you would like a system in which you get out exactly what you put in. In which case one long term serious illness would eat up all the tax you have ever paid. So you should hope you don't ever get sick again after that. Luckily in our system the rich effectively pay for numerous peoples healthcare etc - and rightly so. The average working man probably barely covers his own costs to the system. So in effect (and presuming you are an average working man) you are also subsidised. 95% of the population is subsidised to one extend or another.
    Saddo Fantasy Premier League
    2011/12 - 2nd
    2012/13 -1st Hidden Content
    2013/14 - 3rd (Master won)

    Saddo World Cup Dream Team
    2014 - 1st Hidden Content

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    Quote Originally Posted by ryanman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I think people are too quick to blame Amir for everything.

    It was Sky who backed out of the PPV in what I believe to be an unprecedented decision and he and his team decided that they weren't happy with Sky's behaviour and chose to go to Primetime instead.

    He's lost money as a result so I guess it was a principled decision on his part.

    I think the terrestial companies in the UK are shit for boxing generally repeatedly snubbing fighters, most notable Carl Froch.

    The best scenario would be if the Primetime card does better than expected and they start to establish themselves as a genuine alternative.

    Fuck Sky and their costly subscription services. Anything that would break the stranglehold of Rupert Murdoch's empire would be very welcome.
    I like Murdoch and admire him , his Sky subscription is reasonable in my opinion , £65 per month for HD. Whats expensive about that ?
    haha that made me lol.

    Only heavy hitters like Preme and his national average wage or myself on taxpayers fundings could afford such an extravagance.
    Times are changing , the tide is turning , the revolution is going to happen , and if you do nothing you will get nothing, and you will also get no pity.
    He will get pity from me. I'm happy to pay my taxes to help the less fortunate, and so are lots of other people. So there will be no revolution -or if there is it won't be of the type you expect.
    Can I plump your cushion Bilbo?
    Well if you and your do gooder friends want to pay a bit more , then I dont have to give anything , then its fine by me.
    Actually I'm very much looking forward to the reforms myself.

    I know people on here have assumed that I don't work because I don't want to but that's actually not the case.

    I have taken part time work before but was told to stop it because it would invalidate my health status.

    Currently I am declared permanently unfit for work due to extensive lung damage. This isn't like a bad back that I can fake it's literally that I have pulmonary fibrosis of the lungs, a permanent and progressive condition that once started gives an average life expectancy of five years. You should google it.

    Anyway the problem for me is that in taking part time work I automatically get put onto a three month back to work trial where after three months of working part time I would get an interview to see whether I could go into full time work.

    Because of the effects of lung disease on the whole body I could never support myself full time as I wouldn't be fit enough to work the 40 hours needed to be fully financially independent.

    Hence why I was told by the benefits office not to take the job. I had accepted a 16 hour a week car delivery job. The manager of the car firm was prepared to accomodate my needs and allow me to work 16 hours, and I wanted to do it, but unfortunately the system isn't particularly well set up at present and penalises those who do want to try and work.

    Under the new legislation I will hopefully be supported and encouraged to work without the pressure of losing benefits if I take a job.

    To automatically assume that everyone sick is trying to cheat their way out of having to do anything is very desparaging of a lot of people. Clearly it is the case for some, but a lot of people in this world genuinely have had serious illnesses and are suffering as a result.

    My own battle with cancer was as serious as it gets. I was given six months to live in 2000 and told that my disease was probably terminal as my lung damage was too severe to continue treatment and I had spent 6 weeks in isolation with pneumonia and septeciama.

    I am very self deprecating by nature and don't always present myself in the best light but physically I have been through more than you can imagine and will hopefully ever have to endure.

    It is pretty wretched and unfair what happened to me and it's not like this is the life I would have chosen for myself but we are dealt the cards of life and must cope as best we can.

    Anyway this is too serious a posting for me so I am going back to annoying Miles..
    Bilbo,

    I didn't realise you had been through/are going through all that. I feel for you mate.

    Also, I hope you realise my message was genuine and not sarcastic. I get really annoyed with people that presume that everyone on benefits are frauds/layabouts - its just not the case. And i am genuinely happy to pay taxes to help people that need it (especially when those people would do the exact same if they had the chance).

    I totally agree with you though about the current system penalising people on benefits that seek to work. There are flaws in the system that can lead to people being worse off working say 16-25 hours a week than not working at all (In some cases). I just hope that the changes do not negatively effect those that don't deserve it - but I fear they will. But thats for another time and place I suppose.
    don't feel that sorry for the bugger if you recall his threads on spending all day whacking off, going to the gym and getting in to fights down the pub for messing with other mens women.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    So sick people are not allowed to masturbate. It was the NHS who paid for me to go to the gym, under a health scheme for sick people. I suppose you believe unhealthy people shouldn't be allowed to exercise either? And I got beaten up because I kissed a girl I had in a pub who happened to have a boyfriend, who had a brother, who was in the pub,

    I guess sick people shouldn't be allowed to have relationships or flirt either?

    Would you like us to be put in a camp somewhere and left to die? And yes Dark Al I know this would be your preference too.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    So sick people are not allowed to masturbate. It was the NHS who paid for me to go to the gym, under a health scheme for sick people. I suppose you believe unhealthy people shouldn't be allowed to exercise either? And I got beaten up because I kissed a girl I had in a pub who happened to have a boyfriend, who had a brother, who was in the pub,

    I guess sick people shouldn't be allowed to have relationships or flirt either?

    Would you like us to be put in a camp somewhere and left to die? And yes Dark Al I know this would be your preference too.
    Exactly. I'm glad you agree. Please wear this gold star.

    Next problem for me to sort out?

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    Quote Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    So sick people are not allowed to masturbate. It was the NHS who paid for me to go to the gym, under a health scheme for sick people. I suppose you believe unhealthy people shouldn't be allowed to exercise either? And I got beaten up because I kissed a girl I had in a pub who happened to have a boyfriend, who had a brother, who was in the pub,

    I guess sick people shouldn't be allowed to have relationships or flirt either?

    Would you like us to be put in a camp somewhere and left to die? And yes Dark Al I know this would be your preference too.
    Exactly. I'm glad you agree. Please wear this gold star.

    Next problem for me to sort out?
    Actually I wouldn't mind a gold star. To be classed like a Jew has always been a dream of mine. Bring on the end of the world with you all against us.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan could have signed for ITV.

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    £65= $98.11

    Holy shit that's how much you Brits pay for that? I just signed up last month for the Time Warner package for $150 and that's for the entire year. I get 200 channels, including HBO and Showtime not to mentioned high speed internet access. So it's $13.33 for me monthly.

    So you guys are paying £780 or $1177 yearly? Is it a package deal that comes with like hundreds of channels and high speed internet or just Sky only? That's really expensive to say to say the least.
    Yes it is a rip off, sky only with some crap channels.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
    By Omarvelous in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 02-21-2011, 08:10 AM
  2. Paul Malignaggi signed to GBP
    By Majesty in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-29-2010, 11:56 PM
  3. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 02-21-2010, 04:09 PM
  4. Tito v RJJ:signed for Jan 2008??
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 06:25 AM
  5. Yes, we have signed Pacquiao
    By TheBESTP4P in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-28-2006, 01:12 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing