Re: Groves v smith confirmed

Originally Posted by
skel1983

Originally Posted by
erics44

Originally Posted by
skel1983

Originally Posted by
erics44
i think you are underestimating smith
especially after his defeat to degale i reckon he will be a bit more dogged and dig in more
I reckon it could be points with smith not throwing enough
No I am not you just seem to think every British fighter is amazing, Paul Smith is shite he had 50/50 wars with bums like Tony Dodson and Quigley and got beat by Bundell ffs. He is very average.
groves is british too thicko

No shit Sherlock.
By all accounts your predictions and views on most fighters mate, are not the best. You do seem to over rate all British fighters ( just go and look at the Kell Brook thread ). Smith is crap look at the names I listed he sneeked decisions against crap fighters one of them being Dodson being about 5 years after his best even then he was an average British Fighter, who has Smith beat to make you believe he can live with Groves? Groves will toy with him.
my predictions are pretty much spot on
take last weekend for example, i predicted about 10 fights, got 9 right method of victory, said Ortiz would have 4 rounds
the only one i got wrong was stephen smith
im pretty special at predicting fights
better than you anyway, but thats no shame on you coz i should be professional
p.s. you think groves will do smith early, i think smith will dig in and it will go a few rounds, maybe even points, lets have this fight as the bench, who ever is closest is the best, yep?
p.s. how is saying Kell Brook is the best british prospect over rating ALL british fighters when i am comparing him to other british fighters? surely i am underrating british fighters as well if there is a better british prospect arent I?
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Bookmarks