Quote Originally Posted by GAME
Quote Originally Posted by galaxy76
Quote Originally Posted by GAME
Quote Originally Posted by galaxy76
Quote Originally Posted by GAME
He didnt win the featherweight title or the superfeather weight title . He keeps fighting Morales but he needs to fight the champion
I don't know what your on about but Pacquiao was the featherweight champion. He relinquished that championship to move up to Jr.L. As for Pacquioa/ Barrera it was a one sided beating. Barrera got a knockdown that was clearly a slip then it was all over. manny just swarmed all over him. Barrera had the opportunity for an immediate rematch but didn't take it. If a rematch emerged I think the exact same thing would happen.


"the featherweight champion " is abit nebulous. Could you provide me with the name of th sanctioning body of which Pacquiao was champion ?
If you don't know then your part of the problem in boxing. But I'll help you out... The Ring champion. The only belt that counts. All these alphabet groups are ruining the sport. At least the ring is trying to bring some credibility back to the champions.
I dont need your help . If wana go by what a corrupt biased Yank Magazine says then thats your problem . They can promote whoever they choose but I think the fans can decide for themsleves and see who the best is out there .

They can give the ring belt to whoever they want and they do .Sometimes it may be deserving sometimes it may be BS but we can make that decison
Given that the ring magazine is aimed at fight fans, why would it make sense to go against what the majority of fans think to be the true champions... what would that agenda acheive... except to alienate readers and destroy the magazine and belt's credibility (or in 3 words: make, no, Money)?