Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
sorry but this thread is a bit ridiculous, we've seen worse decisions and there hasn't been as big of an uproar, where was all this drama when Chisora was ripped off against Helenius (which was just as bad a decision as Bradley/Pacquiao), where was the uproar when Macklin got robbed against Sturm, lets face it if Pacquiao hadn't been involved in the fight there wouldn't be so much drama, the decision was wrong IMO but it's not the worst decision in the history of the sport and there was already a simple solution which Pacquiao already has allegedly turned down which is the rematch, Titofan you get mad that people bring up the Marquez fights and although most see them as close fights, I'd dare say more had Marquez winning at least 2 of the 3 clearly, so to be robbed 2 out of 3 fights (had him winning all 3) is just as tragic as you play up Bradley/Pacquiao, it's not being a hater it's just pointing out clear facts, this uproar and drama about petitions and overturning decisions is just another example of how Pacquiao and even Mayweather get special treatment it's ridiculous

(summoning all the patience in my being.....)

For the umpteenth time: I'm not discrediting the Pac-Marquez fights, and people are perfectly within their rights to call them bad decisions as well. I still maintain.... what the FUCK does this have to do with the Pac-Bradley fight?

Number 2, and PLEASE read carefully: The whole premise here (from my point of view, anyway) is not that the decision was bad because Pac came out on the short end. The premise here is that bad decisions are becoming all too commonplace.

It could've been Joe Blow decisioning John Fuck in a bad decision... and at least my outcry would've been just as bad.

It just so happens I finally had enough on this particular fight, and it happens to have been a Pac fight. Feel free (please) to look back through my thousands of previous posts over the years. When the HELL have I ever come across as a "Pactard"?? That's what I thought. Sure, I like Pac as a boxer, and I thoroughly enjoyed his beatings of DLH (where he made him quit whimpering on the stool), Hatton (where he explosively dispelled any talk about Hatton being anywhere NEAR p4p), and Margarito (talk about "karma"...... THAT, my friend, was karma). He TKO'ed Cotto, but what the hell. Cotto wasn't adequately prepared, and it was his own damn fault.

As to WHY the thread....... well maybe I'm just a bit sick and tired of the same old song-and-dance after bad decisions: "Bad decisions are part of the game". Bullshit!! That's the complacent, "let's-sit-on-our-hands-and-do-nothing" point of view. And frankly, I want no part of it.

Do you understand now? Or shall I repeat any part of it?