Seems to be a lose sort of science,

The three judges might be more interested in a more active fighter,

or a point-scoing fighter or mark-down a back-peddler/runner.

There should be one clear system for judging so fighters don't get robbed.

RJJ vs Taver I was an example of poor judging. Cory Spinks seems to get judged

a winner in his fights when others disagree.

What are your thoughts?