Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 151

Thread: Romney vs. Obama Debate - Part II on Tuesday - let's score it!

Share/Bookmark

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Romney vs. Obama Debate - Part II on Tuesday - let's score it!

    Quote Originally Posted by VictorCharlie View Post
    There has been a reduction in federal money to universities since the 80s but it was in research not the general funds that run the university. And yeah us Libertarians like to tell our children how price will outpace inflation for highly subsidized goods as a boogie man bedtime story. I got to say I'm a little disappointed in your retorts lack of graphs. Come on Kirk you know I'm a simple Soldier. You got to give to me barney style.

    I think you under estimate the American voter. Sure both the current candidates are too cowardly to mention significant reform to entitlement spending b/c no one wants to be the first to tell our seniors that the party is over. I'm not interested in another discussion with you about the sustainability of SS and Medicaire but if you believe that they are a major contributor to our debt/deficit and more importantly unfunded future liabilities then you have to agree something needs to be done to either better fund them, reform them or replace them. I think a candidate that was able to articulate the problem, a solution and then point out how complicit the major parties have been in kicking the can down the road would do quite well.
    There's been massive underfunding and cutting of funding for state universities at federal and state level since the 1980s. For some reason the funding cuts co-incided with the increase in tuition costs. The words that do come out of your virtual mouth happen to co-incide the things the think tanks and individuals funded by corporations and billonaires have been propagating for the last few decades.

    Social security and medicare are the third rail of American politics. Massive majorities of the public don't want to see cuts in these programmes. Any politician advocating scrapping them is dead in the water.

    Social security doesn't really need to be reformed anytime soon. Solving Medicare cost growth problems would solve the long term federal deficit overnight and I already explained to you how easy it would be to do.

    Also, too. Ron Paul and his ilk want to "reform" medicare and ss by scrapping them and leaving over 65s at the mercy of the private sector. This is, nationally speaking, a 48 state election-losing position to take.
    Last edited by Kirkland Laing; 10-26-2012 at 04:20 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 43
    Last Post: 10-14-2012, 05:15 AM
  2. Replies: 118
    Last Post: 10-11-2012, 01:56 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-08-2010, 05:04 PM
  4. OBAMA OWNS Clinton at the Caly CNN debate!
    By DAVIDTUA in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-05-2008, 01:08 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing