Quote Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita View Post
I wanna jump in this little debate and clarify some things..

First of all, Cotto never took floyd to the " brink ".. haha c'mon seriously. That's such an exaggeration..

The thing is, Floyd fought down to Cotto's level and his style and pretty much fought in the pocket througout the fight yet Cotto still couldnt damage him..

Just as Floyd did against Mosley, he fought Cotto's fight and still kicked ass!! That's what's so great about floyd.. He fought out of his comfort zone and he still toyed with cotto..

The only fighter who took Floyd to the edge was none other than Castillo..

What Cotto did was nowhere near what Castillo did and that was against a young Floyd..

I have Puerto Rican buddies who always claim that nonsense and i always laugh hard..

Floyd was never in any type of danger when he fought Cotto..In fact he was so comfortable, dude didnt view Cotto as any kind of threat that he decided to sit in the pockets which was so unlike him...

Cotto didn't do nothing... OScar Delahoya was more effective against Floyd than Cotto ever was..
My unbiased view is that Mayweather beat Cotto with ease. Cotto took a few rounds, possibly 4, but Mayweather still won comfortably. On the other hand, over the last couple of years, I thought Cotto gave Mayweather his most difficult fight.

From a different angle, in my opinion, Margarito, with possible cement in his gloves the first time, and without the possible cement the second time, roughed Cotto up more than Mayweather.

Back to Trout though, he started off as a -300 to Canelo. This is a more even fight in my opinion that those odds suggest.