
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe

Originally Posted by
Fenster
You'll have to explain the criteria?
I have no idea how Brook can rate above proven world-class fighters, let alone how Selby or Frampton can be above Murray?
And.... Fury?
What's going on?
Its an attempt to determine who would win if all those ranked were the same size. I love people like you. Murray deserve to be on the list because he beat? He lost to Martinez and drew with Sturm and everyone else he has beaten were nobodies. He did win a prizefighter tho. Selby has looked unbelievable in his last few fights and loos a future world champion as does Frampton.
Brook maybe rated a bit high but who are the prove world class fighters he is above?
I hate people like me.
Selby has been very impressive in his last few fights but hasn't even fought at European level. Frampton's best opponent is a "shot" Steve Molitor. Brook's best opponent is Carson Jones - whose lost a thousand times and never mixed in world-class.
Murray's close loss and draw against two genuine world-class fighters is much more impressive than their "winning" form. He doesn't have a high profile win but neither do the guys you've listed in front of him. We have no idea how they'll fair in world-class. Murray has proved he's at that level.
Khan, Haye and Burns are all proven world-class. If you think Brook beats these guys P4P that's fine. But on form he's not even in the same parish.
And... Fury?
Bookmarks