Here's an open ended question I want to hear you guys' thoughts on.

Why is it that fighters are most remembered for their failures and shortcomings? Even after a successful career people always bring to mind that one night they didn't have it or that one flaw that kept them from being great.

Naz only lost once in his career and his name is always linked to Barerra. DLH was a great fighter in his prime but some define him by the Trinidad night. Etc. etc.

Does a fighter's limitations say more about them than their strengths?