Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Browne had a job to keep up with a 250lb 45 year old Toney and got caught plenty, even rocked a couple of times.

Theres a reason the best name hes fought so far is Richard Towers. Id see Hughie beating Browne this year let alone Tyson. Peter Fury is looking at the same sort f level of opponent for Hughie as Lucas has been facing recently. That tells you something, that someone who hasnt been a pro even a year is lookng to fight people that Browne is after 5 years!

Browne is strong and hits hard but hes not quick, or sharp or has a very good work rate. Hes not hard to hit either and is yet to face any tests himself 5 years in. He will be a good scalp for someone soon as he is making somewhat of a name but only really on forums where hes getting a bit of an undeserved almost cult following.

After 5 years hes fought no one in the top 60 and still hasnt looked great.
wheres any kind of proof in any of this? there are only facts and the fact is that hugie fury hasnt fought the same level of opposition as browne so it tells you very little

dont get me wrong hughie is doing ok

and the reason brownes best opponent so far is towers (if he is) is because he hasnt had too many fights, am or pro, hes coming along nicely tho

none of it answers my question


browne beats johnson, so that only leaves 2 other possibilities