Quote Originally Posted by body head banger
Quote Originally Posted by MRMANICK
I'm sorry but floyd at 130 beats mab,em and pac.MAB would have the best chance but floyd at 130 is too fast and strong for any of them
Floyd wasnt all that great at 130 in my opinion,
and prime barrera would get a ud if you ask me , hes the man to dethrone the prince so hes got that going for him, and i'd say floyd would give him trouble like hes never seen ....
but mannnn the baby faced assasin has seen some sh**t in his time lol
MAB the night he beat NAZ was on a mission. NAZ almost looked intimidated and was getting manhandled. I still think NAZ did ok in this fight considering he lost and all it was not one of the worst beatings I have ever witnessed. Nothing to be ashamed about but fighters handle losing in different ways and NAZ had never lost. I think losing early in ones career can be most benificial to a majority of fighters and it eventually sets you up a lot better for that inevitable loss in the future because lets face it folks, there are not many fighters who go out on top, let alone un-defeated. I really dont see why boxing fans make such a big deal about losing. It's a part of life. The balance can not always be tipped to one side, that would defeat the laws of all things that exsist.
In closing, the MAB we saw on the night he beat NAZ, would have been a great battle between PBF and MAB. Was NAZ ever at a level that PBF is? Can we even compare NAZ to PBF? I say no, for the mere fact that PBF has been tested more than NAZ had been before he decided to quit.

But to try and aswer the question, MAB vs PBF prime @ 130? I say MAB only cus I am a MAB fan
The question here is when is/was MAB's prime and when is/was PBF's prime.

What the hell am I talking about?

LMAO. Sorry I think I went way off here but what ever.