Re: One of the worst decisions of all time

Originally Posted by
greynotsoold

Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita

Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
wasnt a bad decision at all. i had it a draw but i should have had morales winning without the bad knockdown call by the ref at the end of the fight. the 2nd fight was a worse decision than the first.
Exactly.. the first fight was vivid in the minds of the judges so they just decided to give barrera the nod in the rematch..
It's funny because the second fight was actually the most clear cut out of the 3 fights they had.
Morales clearly outboxed him and its not even debatable..
Politics were probably involved as well.. arum probably influenced them in order to set up a trilogy..
Good heavens. Barrera won the first fight by brawling, then he won the next two boxing. He was much better than Morales. Morales had a ton of heart and a sharp right hand. And a ton of machismo; he fought way above himself because he disliked barrera.
You are wrong Morales out boxed Barrera in the second fight and that was a robbery.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Bookmarks