Re: James Toney was freakin' robbed. Absolutely ridiculous.

Originally Posted by
P.G.H Angel Eyes

Originally Posted by
miles

Originally Posted by
wacko3205

Originally Posted by
miles

Originally Posted by
wacko3205

Originally Posted by
Entragian
Still drinking. Yes there should be a rematch! ON TOP OF A PETITION!!!
P.S.= Long live Ricky Hatton. Salute!
Great example! Just out of curiousity...how many of you considered the Hatton fight against Collazo a robbery?
Many did not. That was a close fight...& I suppose a case of robbery...just like the Toney Peter fight.
The fight was close...not a robbery. Toney vs Peter I mean.
Hatton: Collazo was indeed a close fight. IMO a rematch would have been fair....
It seems in the case of Peter: Toney the scores werent even as close as they should have been...
THe thing is...it seems that everyone has more of an issue with numbers than the results.
Watch the fight again...Peter did something that no one has done in longer times than I can count...he hurt Toney multiple times over the course of 12 rounds.
F*** what the judges said...Peter performed better than anyone thought that he would (including myself!) and he had Toney hurt.
I agree completely. Peter was better than I expected too and he didnt fade down the stretch, which I was expecting him to do.
Toney performed better then people thought he would too he deserves just as much if not more credit then you're giving Peter
Not true. Nobody gave Peter a shot in hell on this forum really...that includes me. I gave them both credit...but Peter get's more because, lets be real, he's limited as hell & he was fighting the most gifted fighter of 200 or 233 or whatever...
It was a good fight...but Toney did what I expected...Peter did just the opposite of what I was expecting.
Never beg a 40 dollar hooker...specially after she's just turned down your mom's credit card!!
Bookmarks