Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
The problem with that method is the same as the one ringside - people interpret action different regardless of where they're watching from.

Two judges can watch the same TV footage yet come to the opposite conclusion - and explain why they're opinion is the correct one. We all do it every week here. Thousands of people are watching the exact same TV coverage yet argue about who won what.

You regularly have commentators/pundits sitting together on the exact same table, so they have an identical viewpoint, and the benefit of monitors for replays and what not, yet they see a different winner.
Certainly different judges will judge prioritising different things (going forward, aggression, punch output , punch success,power punches vs Jabs, etc. ) you're never going to stop that, but there would be no outside input and if a judge was way out e.g. Canelo vs PBF (Draw) , they would have a much harder job justifying it.
and definitely , as stated many times before by people, I'm all for them going before the relevant board having to explain how they saw the fight the way they did.
ps. sorry Vendettos, don't agree with your Burns v Beltran theory.