
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe

Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe

Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe

Originally Posted by
ross
They both have an excellent chance of happenng.
Stiverne ain't that good and was getting out punched by Arreola. I don't think he'd catch wilder as easy.
Im backing Fury and after his next fight a few more will to.
His next fight is against a very weak fighter. His odds against Wlad will only drift after that if he doesnt stop him easily as expected. Wilder is favorite over Wilder but most of the smart money is on Stiverne. Id back Wilder to beat Fury everyday of the week.
Wilder is favourite to beat wilder?
Youd back Wilder to beat Tyson?
Based on Wilders performance V?
Sorry Wilder fav over Stiverne.
Based on Wilders power and Furys weak chin is why Id back Wilder. He is wild and crude and if it was an amateur fight Id fancy Fury but I think the power he has coupled with Furys chin I have to fancy Wilder. I also think Fury will be easy to hit. He is difficult to tag cleanly when he has a massive height advantage but the difference here wouldnt be as big (Wilder may actually have the reach advantage?).
Lets rewind a few years.
Who would you back in Wlad v Haye or Khan v Maidana?

Wlad and Khan. Wlad hits harder then Haye. Khan too quick for Maidana who is very one dimensional. Fury is no Wllad and is certainly not comparable to Khan.
A better recent comparison would be Scott v Wilder. Wilder is crude and powerful. Scott is a skilled boxer with a weak chin. Wilder flattened him.
Yeah, scott is a skilled boxer
Scott had been furys sparring partner in the past and Fury battered him and bust both his ear drums. Thats a skilled fighter getting battered by Fury
Wlad hits harder than Haye? Khan too quick for. Maidana? That wasnt your rubbish equation. You said big punch v weak chin, big punch wins.
Hope your boss doesnt read this, you may be looking for a new job

Bookmarks