Andy Lee - Billy Joe Saunders, who wins?

[ross]

I think saunders beats Lee relatively comfortably.

Hes a fellow southpaw so the stance wouldnt give Saunders any problems and Saunders I would say would throw and land more than Quillin did.

Lee is ok if he gets the chance to land but hes not fluid enough to catch up with Saunders.

Saunders is better than we thought and im dissapointed with his next scheduled fight. Hes sort of fallen by the wayside when you compare his career with Eubanks since their fight. Eubank has impressed against an undefeated belt holder while saunders sits around scratching his ass on the sidelines.

Saunders is better than YOU thought I have always rated him. He may not have huge power but he is quick and has enough skill and the ability to throw combinations to put people off their own work. He will throw in bunches and not let Lee set, if he is on top form. Lee can crack a bit though, so I am not writing him off.

He's definitely better than I thought. He's quite defeatist though. He always says he'd never beat Golovkin and I think even he himself gets embarrassed by it because last time. I heard him say it he tried to drag Eubank in with it as well saying golovkin would beat them both on the same night. He's doing himself a disservice because I think golovkin would have problems with both. Certainly more than he did with Murray. It must do Warrens head in listening to Saunders say those things. He doesn't seem to have enough self belief to really be a star.

You don't hear any fighter from any other weight talk about how they'd never beat the best in the division. Whats the point of being there?