I don't get excited with Mayweather fights but I also don't dislike him. In fact I appreciate his tremendous skills to evade punches and traps. Although I'm hoping he takes more risk to make it a fight. They say boxing is to 'hit and not get hit' and I completely agree with that. But I don't put Floyd on that level of a master counter puncher. I believe he's been more of a 'hit when there's no way you can get hit' fighter. The only times he will throw a counter is after/during an opponents left jab (counter right) or against an opponents lunging left hook (check left hook) where he can move away to his left. You'll never see him go for the perfect back hand counter when an orthodox opponent would throw a haymaker right hand. It's obviously very risky, but the rewards are irresistible for a true counter puncher.

Anyhow, my point is credit should be give where credit is due. I was never the type of fan who dislikes a fighter because he's a former felon or how he handles himself outside the ring. I always give them the benefit of the doubt that these are famous people, and the media will not fail to come up with stories suited for TMZ viewers. Same goes for the race card, religion and PEDS bullshit.. I try to stay away from that stuff and only engage myself on purely boxing discussions. And I'm not even a purist. I appreciate all level of fighting, as long as the two combatants gives everything. Sounds like the rock 'em sock 'em robots type of fight but not really. Just two fighters giving their best fight in them even if they're past their prime or still too raw. You know, there's no prime age for heart.