I don't really see much difference between Bush and these 2,they all come out with ridiculous remarks but I believe that it's a good alliance,I believe that there needs to be a counterweight to America,it has too much influence in too many places. Hosni Mubarak's~(Egyptina PM's) son nailed when he said that countries(well he was talking about the Mid EAST i GUESs)need to develop their own ideals and deal with their own problems rather than having other people's ideals imposed upon them(ir America brandishing the sword of democracy!)

Quote Originally Posted by miles
Quote Originally Posted by Lyle
Bush is MUCH different than Chavez...you are the idiot if you think they are the same.

Clinton laid the groundwork for the invasion...W and his cabnet thought they would accomplish something in invading Iraq.
And Bush failed to accomplish very much, the country is sliding into anarchy and civil war....Invading a country illegally was not the means for reforming Iraq. Removing Sadaam was the only good thing to result from this invasion and that wasnt even the reason given for war. One big charade!!

Ideology is what differentiates most regimes, but politicians are pretty much the same. Bush and Chavez are both clowns and the intelligence of neither runs very deep. They are really very similar.
Well said,CC.