Re: The case for Brook

Originally Posted by
p4pking
Why is it a given he's been a "weakened" welter? He's never fought above that weight as a pro and always looked very strong, so it's hearsay.
How does that make it hearsay? It's from the horses mouth so anything but.
If you mean its unproven in the ring as Smash suggested then yeah I see your point. Brook and his team will know through the duration of a camp when he tops out in terms of speed and power. Also as Fenster mentioned, Brook at 147 against Jones and Brook at 152 against the same bloke was like chalk and cheese. What little evidence there is suggests that Brook north of 147 is a much stronger fighter.
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
Bookmarks