I see I'm in the minority here.
@J_Undisputed. Internet IMO waters boxing down all the more.

Sites like Boxrec has a great database that verifies it.
Boxrec one night of boxing. .and it will list 10-20 fight cards globally on any given night.
The internet could broadcast some, but rights would still be argued by whom? The promoters of those cards.

Ever use allthebestfight.com? Good stuff, but a lot of fights they say....can't play do to rights of promoters.

@Spicoli PPV IMO doesn't help\hurt boxing. As what % of boxers headline these?
Of thousands of boxers active only a few hundred are known globally, disagree?
And out of those hundreds, how many today headline PPV? I guess oh, 20 fighters during any era? And the undercard fighters have little impact.

Radio under TeX Rickard & Closed Circuit under Don King introduced fans that boxing never had.
Previous to TeX only men in America knew of boxing. With radio, kids family assembled by that talk box and listened to a new sport. Promoters didn't even think like that back then.....TeX was on some deep shit.
He got something involved called sponsors. The men's shaving product called Gillette....were of the first..
Gillette's Friday night boxing...easy to get the best fights....because there was no competition.
Whereas internet is just another means for promoters...leaving fans to waddle through the mess of promoters that's no more united with the world wide web.

Without a governing body, boxing will always be this way. Not a fact, just IMO.