Scientific Fraud

[p4pking]

He's not the one coming across as a joke here.

Alright p4pking, buy into Anthropogenic Climate Change despite knowing that the "scientific numbers" are changed on a whim.

That seems like the wisest idea.

I'm not "buying" into anything. I'm not an ideologue, but I'm also not scientifically literate and therefore can't argue with, much less ridicule, people who are in good faith. I don't doubt there are countless examples of skewed numbers to support political beliefs or agendas, but it also seems like there is somewhat of a consensus in the scientific community which doesn't support your stance, which seems to be based on the same things. Asserting that the majority of scientists working in the field are more or less shills, without understanding the subject matter nearly enough to form your own opinion, isn't exactly the wisest idea either, surely?

Yup that's right, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain and listen to the great and powerful Oz.

I think you have good sense on a lot of things, and I'm not going to imply that you're some kind of dope because I disagree with you, would be nice to get the same courtesy given that I haven't even made a case one way or the other. What makes you think I'm even subscribing to anything, just out of curiosity? I have no idea how anthropogenic climate change(which is a ridiculous term as the climate always has changed) is, but I do have the utmost respect for science, and as I'm not well versed in it I'll respect the opinion of those who are over politicians who don't have any interest or motive in arriving at the truth. BCollins seems to know a thing or two on this subject, but he's a JOKE apparently. There's no reason to be such an affected political type, you're clearly smarter than that.