Almost ready to call a complete hoodwink process on all of this drawn out he said he said regarding 'sparring-gate 2017'. Firstly, it's sparring. Secondly, we do understand this is Paulie not Mayweather and it speaks volumes imo that Coners camp and himself would need to push this as relevant to that fact. Thirdly and just wondering, isn't there some sort of conflict of interest in a head commentator of the ppv network paid to promote and work the card serving in a paid capacity to one of it's headliners? I don't know..just seems awfully convenient..but sure keeps it in the news eh. More importantly above all, this event is a steaming pile and a middle finger in the center of the forehead of anyone laying down a nickel for it.