Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
I agree Crawford is good too. He is clearly one of the top in his division, but the idea that he is the best fighter out there P4P, which some are suggesting is just ludicrous to me until he fights the best names in his division. This is why I want to see him fight the top 4 and stop messing around with Horn and Khan level fighters. That is a year of his career and I am not sure it is the best use of his time. Khan certainly didn't deserve a big fight. You can give a pass with Horn, but not with Khan.
“Until he fights the best names in his division”,,, only Usyk and Crawford have done that. Your argument against Crawford eats itself. Prey tell who you have at top??
There are several very well known, excellent fighters at WW. Crawford has faced none of them really. BTW it is 'pray' rather than 'prey' though I do actually like the use of word 'prey' as it is unorthodox and I like unusual collocations.
But he beat everyone at Jr WW, his P4P ranking is based on his entire career, not simply his last couple fights.

I just think prey tell is funny in the context of Internet debate. But I think a lot of things are funny and most don’t agree with me haha. You didn’t answer the question though. Cool if you don’t want to, P4P is rather biased so silly. Just I thought it was interesting that Crawford has the best argument by your criteria yet you eliminate him because of your criteria