What is irrefutable and clear? And what do prior trumped up political convictions have to do with this? What does one's personal habits have to do with this? If I am on ignore then I guess Lucy cannot answer the questions, but she never answers questions anyway. So I guess no big loss.

All I and anyone else sees is a nan going to prison for doing something many other journalists have done which is ask a question on the day of a trial decision. They did it in many other cases and as has been pointed out the authorities themselves failed to follow procedure and even then Robinson only revealed what was in the public domain. So, what we have is essentially a 'face' situation' and what many view to be a political vendetta.

He was released from prison because the case was deemed faulty so now that they have invented new charges and interestingly coordinated everything else in order to reduce his voice and make it easier to dispose of him. It will have the opposite effect. All it does is make people question the companies that ban based on lies, those who seek to make a political prisoner for speaking up against forced societal change, and in turn create more resentment.