Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.was...-other-americ/

Tits it’s nice trump gets the shit for calling a city full of murder and drugs a bad name and gets a bad rap. I think your right. The democratic strategy of not talking about it is better. Pretend it’s not happening. These places are rat infested shitholes and unfortunately there is a reason for it. I don’t know about you but I know plenty of people who live in such areas and say that themselves everyday. You may not have seen but there were a lot of Baltimore residents who were glad trump called them out. It’s so bad we have a mass shooting at a mall or school and it’s national headlines. Mass shootings in these cities, which they are, just become statistics. Now trump gets blamed for mass shootings for getting all the white racists worked up. So how about the Chicago mass shootings, oh that’s right they are “different” right. Let’s make sure we separate the two for statistics. The white shooters are crazy racists stoked by the crazy words of an elected president who has declared himself king. Remember he was responsible for sandy Hook and Colorado. All those mass shootings happened under Trumps watch. So he isn’t responsible for the Chicago and Baltimore shootings because they different. Wait yes he is responsible. No wait, they are different.

You gonna give me the Chicago and Baltimore shootings "song and dance" too? Damn... you guys at least follow the same party line.

Sooooo...... the choice is 1) insult Baltimore and all the residents in it.... or 2) not talk about the problems?? No Door #3? Again..... you guys all drink from the same Kool-Aid.

You simply narratives to fit only your choices, and you railroad conversations with your own twists and turns. Meanwhile..... you've got Brock's rah-rah shit like he's always done.

Shit bros..... at least change it up a little, huh?
Nope not at all. Pointing out what’s going on in Baltimore and Chicago and simply pointing out by definition it is a mass shooting, frequently. But it’s a narrative people don’t like. The whole thing of this is pointing out what is going on in these cities, it’s cause, who is denying it, how words are used and media deflects shit thinking a white dude shooting up any race is different than blacks shooting up their own race. It’s a shame his it’s ignored. And oddly it’s the anti gun group who separate this shit. Maybe if we say it’s all tragic shit and need to be addressed and we see what’s happening in Baltimore and what’s behind it. Maybe we can at least try doing something. Funny how the Dems focus on one but can’t mention the other.

I've tried making a distinction between inner city crime-related (gangs, armed robberies, etc) killings..... and the shooting sprees perpetrated on suburban America by snapped whack jobs on unsuspecting crowds at malls, schools, garlic festivals, etc.

But I'll be damned if any of you guys let me.


Inner city shootings are tragic. They must be addressed. They've existed since the beginning of time. None of them are Trump's fault. It should not be ignored. THERE..... did I miss anything? Please feel free to add if I have.

We ok with that?

Is it ok for me to add that if you get shot in downtown Baltimore at 3 am..... that you probably should've known better than to be there? Is that ok? You guys let me know.



Now... the "other" shootings. Am I allowed to draw a distinction between the two? Or is that not permitted by Trump Fan Land?




This is one of those topics that, the more you guys argue against it and try to lump everything in the same shitboat...... the worse your argument looks.
Not u tits the media. Again have you looked at who governs Baltimore and Detroit and how it was the Dems who fucked them. So forget the gun stats if you don’t find it odd that’s fine. This wasn’t about gun control I just included my personal review of the situation. I should have stayed narrow so you would be forced to research what the Dems did to these cities

Understand what you're saying. Mayors and governors not all do the job they were elected to do. Sometimes cities suffer as a result of inept/corrupt leaders. Not doubting that Baltimore has been screwed over by Dem mayors. I'll just add that in the annals of history there's been lousy mayors on both sides of the aisle (almost sounded Trumpish there).

My only point..... ONLY point.... is to say that Trump could choose to criticize the leadership of places like Baltimore without offending its entire population. It's what a true leader does. And before Fats comes in here crying his anti-PC bullshit..... it has nothing to do with PC. That will always be the difference between some of us. Some of you (not saying specifically you) go off the deep end of the pool and call every insult hurled by the leader of the free world a welcome respite from PC. Some of us will call it for what it is.... a fucking, unnecessary insult. Again.... the choice isn't between Door # 1 (being a bleeding heart PC fanatic) and Door # 2 (an insult hurling moron who doesn't know the first thing about decency). There's middle ground, which separates us from the more primitive primates. But..... if some on here want to insist it's either one or the other..... I guess it's their nickel.
Well I don’t like everything trump says. Some of it is unnecessary and crude. For me it started with sessions. Sessions was a loyal dude with trump from the beginning. Sure he made some blunders but I always like to see loyal friends treated with respect. Washington of course is played at a far higher level than my backyard but in some respect certain rules are the same. Thus like all presidents I look at the good and the bad and for me trumps positive outweigh the negatives. Like in the comparison thread you thought I was digging up dirt on other presidents that wasn’t my intent. I like to look at the whole picture when comparing presidents. Even taking into account what lead to Jackson butchering Indians. It’s not what he wanted, he wanted them to move, they understandably didn’t and his policy led to war. It was about gold, when he tried to topple the Fed there was a massive crisis and money was needed to keep shit going. I can’t justify something like that, it was a different time and what happened happened but history hasn’t judged Jackson solely on that. It’s been a mess since the beginning, Washington onwards