Bachelors of Arts in Psychology.
I don't assume such things and never asked as that is just an odd thing to ask. Yes all of them saw heavy combat. None of them British. I didn't ask them about Churchill as they weren't British.
"How have they 'routinely happened'? " ....I wouldn't know how to respond to that other than to tell you that you've misunderstood my post saying you won't take my response seriously, won't accept it, or will misunderstand it. And imagine that, you misunderstood it.
I didn't discuss the EU or UN or NATO with them as I was either talking with them about their individual war experiences in WW2 or family or hunting. Though you probably wouldn't have cared for their stances on Socialism and Communism to be quite honest.
Not really a question, but my response would be: Do you feel censored? You seem to post an awful lot for someone censored if you do feel that way. As for assigning labels to people who hold certain beliefs...there ARE Communists in this world, there ARE Marxists, there ARE AntiFa and they ARE angry and they ARE ugly. Did you feel any irony typing this out?
Oh so kind of like I was doing in describing the Lindbergh book I read until I was interrupted from describing the man and laying out his very complicated history? Kinda like that? Or is this more of a "argue for my side for once" plea?
He has fought subpoena's true, who wouldn't? HRC has as a private citizen fought tooth and nail against Judicial Watch's FOIA requests and subpoenas for answers. I don't begrudge her that, it's part of our court system and she has lawyers which she uses much like DJT uses his lawyers.
"Cut off people's rights to reply" - Actually not a RIGHT![]()
"Trampled his own citizens" - the ones lawlessly rioting?
"Acted like a Communist in strangling the free press" - Not exactly, but I'd be willing to discuss this more
"Refused to show his tax returns" - That's been a gentlemen's agreement and it's not bound by law
I'd ask for specific instances of 8th & 14th amendment abuses just for clarification
As for "removal of people/personal vendettas" - if you serve at the will of the President he can keep you in a position or drop you. that's how it works.
"attacking his own citizens" - He's never extra-judiciously killed an American citizen....Obama did though.
Yyyyyyeah see these are emotions and feelings you're projecting on me I guess in order to make you feel like you have some sort of righteous point.
I've directly responded to your questions (really a lot more statements and accusations than questions weren't they) not that you have EVER done the same for me.
Bookmarks