Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post

Larry Holmes on his last legs beat Ray Mercer.
Good pick, Holmes may not have been shot as much as just past his prime going in against a should've been sure bet to lose.


Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
Good thread, by shot are we talking greatly declined on the tail end of it regardless of opponent more than big underdog though. I'd say like a Edwin Rosario who had been written off more times than losing lotto stubs. He pulled out a come from behind KO over Anthony Jones for a 135 trinket..then gets absolutely battered in next out losing rematch to Juan Nazario. Barely beats a journeyman and looks slower and choppy, then a year later walks into Sacramento as the assumed 'name' doormat for streaking hometown 140 champion Loreto Garza and destroys Garza.
You called it. I wasn't sure of him back then- in terms of his losses, didnt know if he was a hot n cold fighter in contrast to when his skills faded. Stopped in 92' & 93' yet ended his career on a win streak.

Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
2 of those 3 loses for Spinks coming in were nothing to be ashamed of. He had Taylor going backwards all night as the smaller man. Some could argue he even did enough to win the Middleweight Championship that night. The next loss before Latimore was another split decision to hard nosed veteran Verno Phillips.

What about Jhonny Gonzalez over Hasegawa and Mares?
Agreed on Spinks losses, they were legit, but that Lattimore fight he walked in looking like the boxer that got old in the ring.